Second Tower Planned at Waterfront Place

Second Tower Planned at Waterfront Place

Story Options

Think Financial Student Loans

Ellicott Development is moving forward with plans for a second tower at its Waterfront Place development. Meanwhile, a slow start to town home sales at the project has sent the developer back to the drawing board for design changes. Of the four town homes completed, only one has sold. Units in the condominium tower, The Pasquale, have faired much better with 65 percent sold and the building still months from completion.

As currently designed, the traditional, all-brick town home residences range from 2,325 to 2,782 square feet in two or three-bedroom configurations. Each town home includes a private courtyard/patio that will overlook the project's landscaped common area. The town homes, designed by Chaintreuil- Jensen-Stark Architects, are priced from the low-$500,000’s. A fully-decorated model unit is located at 11 Ojibwa Circle.

100_0259c.jpg

“The units are top-quality,” says one realtor who wishes to remain anonymous, “but when buying at that price point in Waterfront village, buyers expect a view of the water and a more open floor plan with soaring ceilings.”

Ellicott now plans to lower the rooflines and scale back the size and price of future town home units. The number of units will drop by one, to 14.

With strong sales in the mid-rise, Ellicott Development is readying plans for a second tower on the site, a twin to the first. Suites in the 49-unit, 13-story Pasquale start at $295,000 and top $1 million for a penthouse. First occupancies are expected this fall.

According to Ellicott Development's Carl Paladino in this morning's The Buffalo News, the company is simply responding to demand:

“We are seeing a small but growing number of people who want to live downtown to be closer to where they work. We think that will continue to increase as the cost of gas rises and they rethink living way out in the suburbs,” Paladino added.

Work on the second tower could be underway next year.

Get Connected: Chris Martoche, Ellicott Development, 716.570.2399 (cell)

WP17.bmp

wplace16.jpg

Entry image and photo above by Matt Kofahl, town home picture by Aaron Zimmerman.

feed your soul buffalo

What Others Have To Say

  1. MichaelB

    3 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 09:34

    I will tell you this, I appreciate the density that these kinds of projects bring to the city and the waterfront property.

  2. Ike

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 09:37

    maybe some other developers will take the hint...

  3. flyguy

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 09:38

    Nice to see downtown add some bulk and some height extend to the other side of the 190. Would still like to see even taller structures downtown going up that 13 floors but this is a nice start. Obviously alot of it has to do with market conditions.

  4. sally

    2 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 09:50

    Wonderful, simply wonderfu:)

  5. flyguy

    2 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 09:56

    A rooftop penthouse unit with views of the sewage overflow Buffalo River. That story posted yesterday still bothers me. Its bad enough that Blackrock/ Riverside has smelled of sewage for years near the Niagara Section of the Thruway and now this right in an area being pitched to reinvigorate downtown with tourist dollars. This area will be no Baltimore Inner Harbor (as in successful) unless things like this and the skyway are dealt with NOW. A few months back I posted a concern about whether there were measures in place to clean surface debris off the water that float around. in Baltimore they have like vacuum boats or conveyor boats that clean up the floating debris that come in whether it be natural stuff of litter (which is disgraceful) or non-intentional wind blown in litter. I had no idea it would include sewage overflow. This really tarnishes the idea of having a nice little Lake Front beach down there as well as far as I am concerned. Then again I dont think the area was ever historically a friendly one (as in Canal Street in its heyday) so maybe its more historically accurate to remain dirty there...lol

  6. DowntownLuver

    3 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 10:41

    Kind of ironic that even when we told Paladino that we hated the new 80's looking town homes and liked the tower, he still built both. And look what he wants to build more of,....ding, ding, ding, another Tower...Really, only ONE Town Home sold, lol. Those things are ugly. Build more high rises, that's what we want.

  7. Matthewjohnp

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 11:17

    Yeah there's no way all those other town houses will be built, as nice as they are inside it's just too much to pay for a condo without a water view. It is also interesting to note that many of the "buyers" already own condos on the waterfront, they are just trading up. Many of the units being sold at Admiral's Walk are to finance new units next door. This is also happening with downtown lofts, people move from one new place to the next. Lastly, more glass in the new tower to open up the lake views.

  8. GDC

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 11:23

    I'd rather live in a tower than a town home myself. Better Views from above those brown houses.

  9. paragon

    3 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 11:30

    The new tower should include city views. The current tower under construction has views that only feature the water. After nightfall the best views are of the skyline all lit up. Also add 5 more floors, they will sell.

  10. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 11:37

    That last images does show a lot about the design. The city can expect to see what? A big blank brick wall. I agree with paragon. There should be a holistic design to the new tower. One that doesn't look like it is literally turning its back on downtown

  11. sally

    5 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 12:21

    DowntownLuver - Which one did you buy? Since it is all about what you want? Or are you still living in your Dad's basement?

  12. mbhxam

    2 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 12:31

    Seriously...why would you block out the entire back wall? It seems obvious that people would prefer a panoramic view...Can anyone think of a reason the tower would be built this way? Odd...

  13. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 12:34

    ^cheap 'design'

  14. Andrew

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 12:37

    Those town housed dont look so bad just make the windows a little bit bigger. and great to hear about the third tower.

  15. Andrew

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 12:38

    town houses* (spelling)

  16. RonR

    2 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 12:41

    While these are nice, I think some condo towers in the downtown core would do even better.

    If you look at a map, there are several sites between Washington and Ellicott that would be awesome locations.

    How about the parking lot across Lafayette Square? Library Tower add in a conversion or an upgrade to the Hotel Lafayette and that square is awesome. Or a couple of blocks north, on both sides of W. Chippewa. Theater tower 1 and 2.

    These are empty parking lots. Make the opportunity so sweet for the owners of these lots that it would be crazy NOT to develop.

  17. bfloghost

    4 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 12:45

    To echo some thoughts here... I think all glass buildings have become way too pervasive but damn they do look nice along water, like Toronto's waterfront. That brick tower looks like it belongs at the Amherst campus.

  18. MJWorthington

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 12:53

    I agree. The city planning board must like the blank wall views of these buidlings from city hall. If you are going to replace the view of the water, what better than some blank walls to really maake you forget what used to be there?

  19. mbhxam

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 12:55

    Even if the architect is against an all glass tower, that certainly doesn't prohibit windows on the back side. It just is very odd to me. I was very surprised when I saw the back of the tower being covered with bricks...

  20. STEEL

    4 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 13:06

    This project overall is cheap with the windows. If he wants to sell those townhouses just make the windows bigger. My god, could they have made them any smaller?

  21. mikejm

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 13:21

    The scale of the windows appear small, but the problem is actually the height of the ceilings. the windows are between 50 and 60 inches; but the ceilings are a very tall. You have three stories of ceilings that are 8', 9'6", and 9'. Lowering the ceilings on the new town houses may make the interior less open, but will probably improve the exterior aesthetics.

  22. mikejm

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 13:22

    The scale of the windows appear small, but the problem is actually the height of the ceilings. the windows are between 50 and 60 inches; but the ceilings are a very tall. You have three stories of ceilings that are 8', 9'6", and 9'. Lowering the ceilings on the new town houses may make the interior less open, but will probably improve the exterior aesthetics.

  23. GDC

    2 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 13:30

    Well, I guess that's why the tower is "Waterfront View", doesn't include the city view. Which is too bad, I'd rather have a cool view of the city, especially at night.

  24. carl

    4 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 13:33

    perhaps they can actually hire an architect with eyes and a brain for this one

    doubt it though.

  25. jhill

    4 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 13:46

    Hey all you complainers.....take a lesson from Russert: "Thou Shalt Not Whine"

  26. sonyactivision

    4 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 16:03

    Even the tower(s) need more and larger windows, on all sides. Why does everything have to be coated with a Neo-Georgian brick veneer? More people would want to live in waterfront high rises if they all didn't look like the Marina Drive Apts.

  27. bobbyraz49

    2 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 16:38

    Hey Sonyactivision...RIGHT ON ! The Marine Drive appartments need some serious sprucing up. Now that there is much to offer at "Canal Side".

  28. MRodgers

    6 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 17:17

    Gee whiz, Carl, thanks for adding another Vegas-styled tower on the waterfront! Thanks for spending the cash on this instead of remediating the Graystone! Afterall, there's poor people living around the Graystone, so who gives a rat's ass about it, right?

  29. davvid

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 18:03

    all that brick will allow that big wall to "blend with its surrounding historic context"

  30. csobuf

    7 ratings12345
    Jun 17th, 18:53

    My biggest problem with all of the new downtown housing, is its too expensive. The apartments are all the price of a mortgage in a lot of decent neighborhoods around western new york. The condos are the price are a high end home. We need something for the recent college grad that wants to live near work, walk to work and walk to the night life and entertainment.

    So the other day I was eating lunch in the Main Place Mall food court and had and idea. That building is never going to be a full office building, and its never going to be a real mall. I thought why not affordable apartments? $450-$900 studio 500sqf to 1100sqf, 1br, 2br, even a few 3 br for those who wan to split up the bills.

    I envision gutting he building and cutting it up into apartments. The a hallway for entry would run length wise right through the middle of the retail space currently. The exterior apartments would have balconies and window to the outside. The interior aparments woudl have balconies and window to what used to be the pedestrian area of the mall.

    That pedestrian area already has some sky lights but I would remove where the ceiling is solid and turn it into a full atrium. I've seen this concept in a lot of hotels. then you can make that area into and activity space. Plant lots of plants, put in a track for jogging and walking, a basketball court, a pool, and some gym equipment, benches maybe even a gazebo. I think this would be just an absolutely awsome selling point for this area, it would give young professional a virtual park like environment 12 months a year. I know being in my 20's this is one of the biggest gripes of my friends, is the winter months when they can only sit on thier couch.

    You could still use the main street side for retail frontage keeping it a mixed use facility, and not cutting off that much frontage on Main St. which I hear is supposed to be a retail strip. The parking garage would provide ample parking for the residents of the apartments. With the indoor portion it would be a real draw for those that want to be active during the winter months.

    I just think it would be an inovative use of a rather useless building. I think with the sheear size you could cram enough units in there to get a return on the investment. I also think its important to solve the void of affordable and adequate housing downtown, not just catering to the well off and empty nesters.

  31. GDC

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 18th, 01:27

    CSOBUF, that's not a bad idea, and in fact, I do remember seeing online a few years back on an illustration done of the Main Place Tower/Mall if turned into living spaces. The tower had a few openings for porches and the first level was used for a grocery store and other retail services. So your idea is not very far fetched, it's a great one and should be considere. Time to Build NEW Office towers and replace the old with living spaces. That would finally solve the empty space problems.

  32. gaustad

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 18th, 02:17

    Does anyone have an opinion on what is going to happen to the existing real estate on water front with Paladino's tax credits -

    I see prices on older units dropping dramatically

  33. TonyMacaroni

    6 ratings12345
    Jun 18th, 04:00

    I see a 30% decrease in home values in Buffalo in less than 24-36 months. The income levels just don't justify the price increases. Everything hits buffalo 3-5 yrs late including the housing boom and subsequent crash, Zubas, mullets, Iroc Z28's, Mike Folgno jerseys, and stone washed jeans. Sell sell sell.

  34. sally

    3 ratings12345
    Jun 18th, 09:45

    Tony you are indeed lacking a clue.

  35. buffaloboy14

    3 ratings12345
    Jun 18th, 10:53

    Paladino for MAYOR!!!!!!!!!!!

    I freaking love this guy...he speaks the truth about everything wrong with the city and the city education system and he isnt afraid to do so even though he has millions of dollars of investments on the line. He has the intellegence to build awsome upscale condos on the waterfront and still make them affordable. Now we just need him to knock down those project looking buildings at the erie basin marina.

    P.S. the townhomes are struggling. A good selling point for all you Sabre fans is that Derek Roy lives in one of them

  36. sonyactivision

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 18th, 19:18

    Thanks for those memory lane images, TonyMacaroni! But what do income levels within Buffalo have to do with a housing market that is attracting buyers from outside the city? Income levels in Camden NJ couldn't be any worse, yet they are building new waterfront high rise condos there. What's that about?

  37. TonyMacaroni

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 19th, 00:51

    that question shows your complete lack if understanding of economic markets. Real estate values are in direct correlation with income levels. Avg income in bflo is $24,000 second lowest in the nation. Elmwood village and wterfront prices cannot sustain these levels, even though there are only a few thousand if these residences available. You heard it here first 20% decrease in 36 months

  38. BuffaloSoldier

    3 ratings12345
    Jun 19th, 13:47

    These are the ugliest buildings I've ever seen. Even 1970's style architecture (conv ctr, city court, etc.) has more character than this. Who is Paladino's architect? Clearly he's cheap. This is our most premier waterfront real estate and he builds this overpriced non-sense. Typical Paladino.

  39. MJWorthington

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 19th, 13:51

    Thinks do look dire when you ignore the rest of the metropolitan area. There's some money in Erie county and the city is justified in developments to lure them.

  40. sally

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 19th, 14:58

    Tony Macaroni - 1) second lowest income in the nation is only when the study is limited to the cities > 250,000 population. Include all Cities and Buffalo is not even in the bottom 10 percentile. Even both Rochester and Syacuse are poorer than Buffalo not to mention dozens of other cities throughout the country.

    2) Income levels within the City are irrelevant when you are targeting those in the suburbs to move in. And guess what as you fill more upscale housing the average income figures will RISE

  41. sonyactivision

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 19th, 23:38

    @TonyMacaroni, real estate values peg to income levels in most markets. (some markets, such as coastal Virginia and North Carolina have real estate values that far outstrip the incomes of area residents) So what is Buffalo's "market"? Is it just Buffalo City and its predominantly poor demographic? Or is it the Western New York Region, which has a fair number of the affluent? Remember, this development has fewer than 100 units. In an area of over 1 million, there aren't 100 people that like the lakefront and can afford those condos?

  42. billo

    1 ratings12345
    Jun 20th, 13:23

    Tony - first you say 30% decrease in 24-36 months, then a couple posts later you are at 20% decrease in 36 months...the housing boom never hit Buffalo (or maybe it hasn't YET - in which case property values are really going to explode!). Why do you think you can still get a decent piece of property for less than 200K around here? And while the "average" Buffalo income may indeed be quite low, so is it in NYC. Do you think the "average" incomes in NYC (40-50K in Manhattan, less in the boroughs) can support the thousands upon thousands of housing units in the city that are well over $1M?? That aside - what's your point anyway? "Average" real estate values in Buffalo are still dirt cheap. A few condos won't impact that in the slightest.

  43. Metropolis

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 22nd, 22:49

    I like the progress and the success, but why can't we get a real tall, skinny, sleek condo like Toronto has, all glass and stuff? The Waterfront looks just like the other tower just near it - all brick and stuff.

    Real estate development isn't charity, it's about profit.

  44. sally

    0 ratings12345
    Jun 23rd, 09:35

    I agree with Metropolis - it's too bad Gates Circle isn't going to happen it had a real shine to it.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links