The Future of Main Street - Part 2


Almost as long as I can remember, people have been floating the idea of reintroducing traffic to Main Street. While the effects of the Pedestrian Mall on Main Street can and should be debated, I am not aware of any recent, credible studies suggesting that the reintroduction of traffic would reinvigorate the commercial vitality of Main Street Buffalo, especially without significant room for additional on or off street parking. Unfortunately, it appears that Mayor Brown’s administration will follow in the footsteps of Mayors Sedita, Griffin and Masiello; grasping at unproven silver bullet solutions without exploring alternative solutions.
Many of the comparisons I make are to the City of Minneapolis. Some of the reasons are obvious, like the fact that I currently live here. However, I believe Minneapolis provides a good comparison for several reasons:
- The demographics of the two cities were remarkably similar through most of the 20th century. It has been over the last 25 years or so that the cities have taken two drastically different courses.
- Both cities have similar winters. Protecting individuals from the elements during the winter months is crucial to developing a 24/7/365 downtown atmosphere. Minneapolis has done a remarkable job of this, primarily though their skyway system and dependable mass transit.
- The Pedestrian Malls of both cities were implemented on major thoroughfares, Main Street in downtown Buffalo and Nicollet Avenue in Minneapolis. Both pedestrian malls continue to reflect the economic realities of their respective cities.
With approximately $50 million available to improve conditions along Main Street, I believe there are several, more common sense solutions that could be implemented rather than a full scale reintroduction of vehicular traffic. Priorities should include reconnecting areas on the eastern and western sides of Main Street by restoring key thoroughfares of the original street grid, improving the green space aspects of the street, encouraging high scale residential development and greater retail opportunities.
Here are just a few alternatives for the $50 million:
- Reopen Mohawk Street between Pearl and Ellicott. This could be completed relatively quickly as there are no structures along Main Street that would obstruct this development. This would provide several additional on-street parking spots and improve access to the existing parking garage at Washington and Mohawk Streets.
- Begin a dialogue with the Main Place Mall ownership group around re-opening Eagle Street. The idea would be to essentially divide the mall into two separate structures (through incentives) that could serve as smaller, courtyard style shopping destinations with frontage along both Main Street and a newly reopened Eagle Street. The two structures could still be connected through an overhead walkway and the newly reopened Eagle Street would allow traffic to flow across Main Street from Ellicott to S. Elmwood. This could also make the AM&As property more attractive to potential investors.
- Remove the existing, outdated Metro Rail Stations and replace them with up-to-date ones that will protect waiting passengers from inclimate weather. Bus stations along the Nicollet Mall in Minneapolis (see picture) provide a good example of what could work in Buffalo. Smaller circular glass structures that include overhead heating would not only be more beneficial to riders, but improve sight lines to existing storefronts and allow for a more “open” feel to the street
- Increase green space throughout the mall by installing additional trees, bushes, flowers and fountains. Renovation of the parkway between North and South Division Streets would also be included, along with new signage throughout the corridor
- Provide incentives to potential retail outlets interested in locating downtown. Ideally, the city could lure one large retailer, such as a Target, and use smaller incentives to lure supporting retail to the area.
In addition, a feasibility study should be started to examine implementing a skyway system throughout the downtown/Main Street core. Some of the required infrastructure is already in place (Rath Building – Main Place Mall/Liberty Building- AM&As structure / Hyatt – Convention Center) and additional walkways could be added as development progressed. This would require quite a bit of cooperation among the various building owners and managers, but could be the best way to foster a strong retail core without sacrificing the urban environment.
Another major, long-term priority should be reopening a dialogue with the University of Buffalo and the Town of Amherst about expanding light rail service to North Campus. While there undoubtedly will be nay-sayers on this issue, it would provide direct-easy access to downtown for tens of thousands of UB students. It would also allow residents of Western New York’s largest municipality (outside of Buffalo) direct, easy access. Funding for such an expansion would need to be secured from several sources, but one area is UB’s transportation fee that it charges to students each semester. Much of the fee currently funds buses that run between the North and South campuses, which could be eliminated with the completion of this expansion. While there are many details to work out with such a proposal, the time may be right to reignite this discussion. With UB’s 2020 Plan shaping up, and President Simpson’s commitment to the City of Buffalo and expanding the downtown campus, easy access between the three campuses is crucial and fits with the school’s place as an economic engine for the region.
While some of the ideas listed here are more feasible than others, I believe that they, along with other alternatives deserve serious study and consideration. The full potential of Main Street can only be realized through a comprehensive plan that includes greater residential and commercial development in an environment that is conducive to all forms of traffic. If we act too hastily and move ahead with the long-term, disruptive construction project of reintroducing traffic, it could very well end up being the next great mistake that our community debates for the next twenty five years.

As in Kansas City, Cordish Companies is lead developer for a new destination entertainment district in downtown St. Louis. And like big projects in Buffalo and elsewhere, this one has had a long gestation period. Plans for Ballpark Village were first announced in 2002 and site work for the project just started in early-August. Cordish, involved since 2005, is partnering with the St. Louis Cardinals on the multi-block, mixed-use development.
The International Institute of Buffalo has provided refugees and immigrants a way to overcome language and cultural barriers while celebrating their own cultures for 90 years. Established in 1918, they help thousands of people from all walks of life every year get settled into life in the United States by helping them learn English and to find jobs and homes.
Now, in collaboration with Just Buffalo, they are proud to present “Sankofa: an evening of African culture, past, presen …
For weeks now, anyone trying to walk down the west side of Main Street (near the corner of Allen) has been met with this disgraceful mess. Can you imagine that just one block away is the Medical Campus? And this is what you will find if you walk from Allen Street to the Granite Works project? You can't walk, you can't bike, you can barely look at this mess without wanting to shake someone awake at their City Hall desk. A day maybe, but weeks... really?
When I walked into Campieri …
Picture this scenario; you are a fly on a wall in a major company and you are watching the president read the cover letters of possible employees. The president sits at his desk, letter in hand, cup of coffee in the other, and begins reading as you look over his shoulder. You are no editor, but after the first three sentences you can't help but notice at least two grammatical errors. The president immediately puts the letter in the garbage and picks up the next one.
Knowin … 





Comment Options
STEEL
Nicollet Mall = not very lively in these images. Are we sure this is a model of good urban design?
The Main Street ped mall in Buffalo has been a disaster for Buffalo starting with the extremely tacky architecture. It did not cause Main Street's collapse but it did hurry it along and is preventing any improvement. With no traffic Main Street is out of sight out of mind. Opening up a 2 cross streets is not going to do anything to revive this as a destination in Buffalo.
Report this
billo
Mr. Gardner, you present some very good ideas to improve downtown, however I respectfully disagree that reopening Main Street to vehicular traffic would be a "great mistake." If anything, the mistake was removing vehicular access in the first place. The fact is, while downtown parking is scarce and needs to be addressed, people in the WNY region generally prefer to drive places if they own a car. Limiting Main Street to pedestrians only cuts off the exposure of establishments that seek to open their business there. While your proposals may work to stimulate traffic on Main St, it would take a huge amount of coordination that would drag the process out even longer, and if Main St still looks dead after all the money is spent, what then?
Adding cars back to Main St will in no way be any kind of "silver bullet" solution and anyone who thinks it will be is not being realistic. The point is to correct a previous mistake - and better position the area for future development. If the pedestrian mall had worked, this would not even be a topic of discussion, unfortunately the realities of the past 25 years prove that it has not worked. The city can and should work to improve downtown by examining many of the solutions you present, however, these should be considered in connection with returning cars to main st, not in place of it.
Report this
Biniszkiewicz
Retail follows people. Retail requires many people. The thousand or so apartments which have been or soon will be added to the downtown core will not bring any Targets downtown. We may see a few more retail shops catering to clients of better means as downtown continues to improve in look and feel, but these are not going to be big draws like the AM&As of old. Time was that 600,000 lived inside the city and downtown was the only retail game in town. The first plaza outside downtown was the University Plaza, I think. Then Thruway Plaza, etc., until now the Boulevard, Eastern Hills, Galleria and McKinley retail areas get the lions share of retail. North Buffalo has put forth a credible effort at creating another retail hub.
Downtown retail is dependent upon downtown users and residents. A few thousand more residents can't support a great wealth of retail. It's the regional population drain which has exerted the greatest adverse impact on Buffalo's development as compared with Minneapolis. They have liberal politicians, too, but have nevertheless managed to grow as a region. I'd like to learn more about why that is.
Comparisons similar to Minneapolis might be made to Toronto. It, too, is cold. In my parents' day, Toronto was the hick town and Buffalo was the big city. Canadian immigration, Quebec emigration and the absence of any Canadian sun belt have translated into spectacular growth there. We don't compare to Toronto anymore and never will again. But we are not the only rust belt burgh to lag.
I'd rather think 'sustainable' than 'big'. I like the idea of a pedestrian skyway. I'm not sure how much could be obtained for reasonable dollars, but a way to escape winter's worst would be welcomed by many. That might help downtown attract more users. But it wouldn't be easy or cheap to create. Besides all the bridges, you have to carve space out of many dozens of buildings. That takes ingenuity, money, co-operation and a compelling argument. Not easy.
I think we're stuck with the Main Place Mall. The underground parking is one reason. And maybe we're even stuck with Mohawk, given that Carl Paladino's tenants park their cars in that private lot in the middle of the public street. I'm not sold on cars returning to Main myself and I agree with you I'd like to see more greenery, but there are many who are utterly convinced that cars will help. As for me, the fashion of the subway stops is not surviving the test of time and I wouldn't mind seeing them replaced with lighter, cleaner, smaller stations. I think the traffic plan includes that, but not sure.
Report this
stephenjames716
Great article! These are great ideas and keeping the discussion moving is key.
Report this
Bellajl
Almost anything is better than what is currently on Main St. With gas prices so high and pollution it would be nice for the metro to go out to UB Amherst (and out to other areas like Southtowns, Cheektowaga, to the Falls, etc.. Never been to Minneapolis but in some recent travels I went to Indianapolis' Circle Center and Cleveland's City Center, both were very nice (and crowded) downtown shopping areas/malls that were connected with underground & above ground ramps and also connected to hotels, the sports arenas, etc. and could be looked at as examples too.
Report this
WholeLottaJibbaJabbah
I don't see bike lanes. You want people downtown, let them ride their bikes down there.
Report this
reflip
A pedestrian skyway is a bad, bad idea. We want people ON the streets, not above them. No cars plus no people equals empty street. Empty street equals empty buildings. Escape the inclement weather by ducking in and out of a few stores. While you're there, buy something.
Report this
doc
Mr. Gardner if you feel so passionate about Buffalo and the pedestrian mall then why aren't you living here? Oh, I thought so, you have a job in Minneapolis and there in lies the problem. You didn't add that there are immense differences in population parameters. Or that Minneapolis is an isolated white collar city that does not have to compete with NYC, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Boston, Toronto, Hamilton, Detroit or all of the other large metropolitan centers in what comprises the largest megalopolis in the country. You mention that Minneapolis and Buffalo are remarkably similar for most of the 20th Century until the two cities took dramatically different courses 25 years ago but you did not discuss the industrial de-revolution that shook this city to it's very core as tens of thousands of industrial jobs dried-up. Nothing of the kind ever happened in Minneapolis. I moved from Buffalo to the "Twin Cities" area in 1981 to complete clinical training and I have to tell you that the developments which caused Minneapolis to surge ahead of Buffalo were well underway before then because I saw it myself. In 1981 there was a remarkably palpable urban core and vitality in Minneapolis that was totally absent in Buffalo. Also in 1981, and still, there was no competing from the likes of NYC sucking the financial vitality out of the rest of the state of Minnesota. And as for the politicians, there were more level-headed, less self-serving individuals running the show in Minnesota at that time. I believe at that time we had "six-pack Griffin" sitting in city hall refusing to attend the national conference of American City Mayors because he didn't think Buffalo needed representation and he didn't want to stray too far from his politically appointed base of friends and hacks. Or was it Stanley Makowski who started to build a brick wall around the McKinley monument because his paranoia had gone awry, I can't recall. The poverty level in Minneapolis was much lower as well, and still is. Also there are hundreds of thousands more people in "The cities" with much higher rates of disposable income than exist here in metro Buffalo. Opening up the pedestrian mall, which should never have been built in the first place, is a prudent decision for Buffalo. Most cities that built malls have re-opened their streets to traffic again. When Buffalo adds another 100,000 people with money then you can make your comparisons. Until then it's comparing Apples and Oranges. I appreciate your post and respect your opinion but you are way off base on this one.
Report this
strom903
Main street should be just what is says- a street. For 100 plus years this "street" thrived with traffic just like every major street in America. Americans like cars and cars like streets. Thats just the way it is. For anyone that thinks that these Pedestrian Malls are so great; try it in Toronto, New York, even south beach in Miami. Those cities would not even allow that concept to be mentioned let alone be put in place. If you are going to spotlight Minneapolis, why don't you spotlight all the cities that had Pedestrian Malls and dismantled them years ago with no regret.
Report this
sbrof
cars on main wont make a difference because people don't go to downtown to shop now any more than they go to Jefferson. It is out of the collective retail mind and businesses are not going to srout up just because they get a couple hundred people driving by a day.
downtown retail needs to be built from the ground up again through residential developments. Bringing money and people to downtown is how to draw businesses, the same process that suburbanizations drew the businesses out of the city to begin with. Anything else is just wishful thinking.
That isn't to say that the pedestrian mall couldn't be a fantastic place without being full of retail. Bridging the divided downtown is a strong start. There is a lot of money and workers on the west half of downtown ins the Erie County buildings that are cut off from Main Street because of the Main Place mall. Drivers need to get close to their location not to it directly. That is an impossible wish if we want to keep our downtown resembling a downtown. Look at all of those pictures.. you see any parking lots? try to find as many streetscapes in our downtown where parking doesn't show its face.. Almost impossible. We have more room to park in downtown than almost any other city. The problem is it isn't managed properly and the dead end / one way streets that were created during the pedestrian mall construction causes problems getting people to the parking that is there.
Great article lets see where it goes from here... and of course the Light rail to UB North is a no brainer. Let people drive a shorter distance and leave their cars in the comfort of UB North to come downtown. Sounds like a win for the Uni, a win for amherst residents, a win for downtown, and a win for students.
Report this
Texpat10
I have to disagree with the "people in Buffalo love their cars" argument that is used to promote the idea of returning traffic to Main St. Americans, in general, love their cars. Buffalo is no different. With the exception of the residents of a few very large and very urban cities Americans own and drive their own cars. This may change in the future but for now it is the case.
Pedestrian malls have worked in some cities and not in others. Buffalo's isn't particularly attractive and has little to offer but putting cars on Main doesn't solve that. When was the last time someone told you that they would go downtown except they skip it because they can't drive/park on Main St? When was the last time you were caught in a traffic jam on Franklin because cars couldn't drive on Main? Think about it.
While I wouldn't promote taking cars off Main if the decision were being made toda, I don't think that putting them back is the right move. Spend the money on improving what we have and not on the waste of time and money that putting cars back on Main will amount to being.
Dan's post has some great suggestions on how the money can be better spent.
Report this
zenfur
Yeow...whats the problem with a few strategically placed pedestrian skyways? I've been in Cleveland where a few skyways connect some major office buildings and hotels with the Tower City Center. People walkfrom their offices to grab lunch there constantly-without having to put their coats on. I don't think the idea is to create a huge skyway-highway for the haves and keep all the have nots on the street. Pedestrian skyways are also a real plus to connect larger parking garages to destinations.
Carefully placed, they can be a real asset.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
Compare the carless portion of Main St south of Edward to the same portion of Delaware Ave, 3 blocks west of Main. That part of Delaware is more alive and successful than the same part of Main. Coincidence that one has car traffic and the other doesn't? Doubtful.
The pedestrian mall here is a desolate flop. It's almost surprising anybody defends it so strongly as this author. If Minneapolis has better luck with the same idea, great for them. There's many variables. Most cities who tried pedestrian malls have had bad results.
Restoring car traffic of course won't be a silver bullet for Main St, and I haven't heard anybody serious claim it will be. There's many reasons for Main St.'s decline.
This isn't all about retail. As Bini said, future retail on Main will be small compared to the burbs, or even compared to more population-dense healthy parts of the city such as North Bflo and Elmwood. A reasonable goal for that part of Main St eventually would be to have a mix of retail and non-retail activity similar to what that part of Delaware now has. That would be a step up, and even that won't happen without car traffic to allow easier access and let a flow of people in cars actually see the businesses. What will this accomplish for the city as a whole? Not a whole lot, but it will enliven an embarrassingly dead looking part of a major street and undo a big mistake.
Report this
Texpat10
Strom, Miami has an extremely successful pedestrian mall on Lincoln Rd. It is a main shopping street that was in decline. Today it thrives, in large part because of the pedestrian mall and the fact that it was done right. It has plenty of landscaping, art and is generally inviting. Miami's weather helps a lot but our mall could be much better than it is if it followed some of the design elements of Lincoln Rd.
Report this
buf2dca
LOL ..Look at the throngs of people in those photos walking down Nicolette Mall, Sort of like Times Square. Get Real, It's one step from being as desolate as Main Street. Been there. Downtown Minneapolis is not a model for a vibrant urban core. Think New York, Boston , Chicago, San Fran, Philadelphia, and DC. The latter two tore out their desolate pedestrian Malls which had been flanked by decimated Retai (dollar stores) and vacant store fronts into chic urban venues ... WITH CARS.
Report this
Downtownjunkie
Especially in Buffalo I would think that the skyway underground connector would be a no-brainer. Has anyone checked out Montreals underground area? Its not taking people off of the streets but more about giving people the convenience of not having to walk out into a blizzard to grab a cup of coffee etc. I would much rather see the money alotted for bringing traffic back on main go towards reconnecting key streets such as genesee and eagle and creating a better skywalk system for downtown residents and workers. Better signage on main st and downtown in general could also do wonders for the pedestrian mall for visitors to our city as it is now there are still signs guiding people to main street for shopping LOL
Report this
sbrof
"Compare the carless portion of Main St south of Edward to the same portion of Delaware Ave, 3 blocks west of Main. That part of Delaware is more alive and successful than the same part of Main. Coincidence that one has car traffic and the other doesn't? Doubtful."
ok now go one, two or three blocks east to Michigan... full of cars and and still no life. Coincidence?
Report this
GDC
Certainly alot cleaner and more modern than downtown Buffalo, wish the Main Place Mall would do an upgrade in it's apperence (inside and out). I do believe that re-opening Main Street, continue to bring residence back downtown, and more investment in the area (restorations, new builts, etc.) that Retail will follow (we just got the Jenny Shop and next month a new Men's Shop) as they are already popping up.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
sbrof - As I said "There's many reasons for Main St.'s decline". Car traffic is only one.
There's many differences between Michigan Ave and Delaware Ave. Of those three streets, it looks clear to me that trying to make as realistically close as possible an apples-to-apples comparison would consider the set of non-traffic factors (building types, etc.) that are along Main and along Delaware to be much more similar to each other than comparing either of those to Michigan Ave.
Report this
Texpat10
Actually Louise, I think it is a complete coincidence and has nothing to do with cars. Delaware Avenue has always been worlds apart from Main Street. As the two streets begin to diverge on their way out of downtown Delaware Avenue is the spine of the high end residential core. The stores have been higher end and the residences grand. Main Street doesn't have that same character and never has. At the turn of the last century Delaware Avenue was listed as one of the five grandest streets in America. Main was, well, Main.
Main Street retail in the downtown core was comprised of department stores. Those stores closed with the shift of american buying habits and the rise of the suburban shopping mall. That was exacerbated by the death of the locally owned department store and industry consolidation.
Putting cars on Main does nothing to change that. It doesn't add parking and it does absolutely nothing to make the area a more pleasing place to be. It just gives one more street full of empty storefronts to drive down.
I also believed that this is really ill timed. If Canalside is a success then the city should concentrate on bleeding some of that business up Main Street by making the area more inviting. That means green space, entertainment and residential. Where people go, retail will follow. Cars are not vital to that mix especially given that you can drive up and down all you want one block off of Main.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
Texpat - It's Louse. Yes, same point as with my reply to Sbrof, I agree Main and Delaware aren't exactly the same, never said they were, but they have relevant similarities. That and fact that decline of Main St is so stark to what we see in pictures from before the ped mall, that my guess is with cars Main St has a chance to get some more vibrancy than it has now. A closer level of aliveness such as Delaware's could be in reach, although for reasons you point out it might not recover to Delaware's level.
How important it is to Buffalo that downtown Main St become more alive is arguable, but I disagree that anything other than car traffic could fill in nearly as much of Main St's empty storefronts as car traffic might. Most won't be filled with retail even with cars, but I don't think most will fill with anything if cars are prohibited in the long term.
To me the choice is between accepting Main St's current emptiness or bringing back car traffic. The Canalside impact on Main (if any, and I'm not a fan of Canalside but won't get into that here) will be only way down toward the southmost part of Main near the Aud. Nothing to do with most of the ped mall blocks.
We'll agree to disagree about whether car traffic in general makes a commercial block a 'more pleasing place to be'. To me it does, and to you it doesn't. Let's try removing car traffic from any block of your choosing on Elmwood for one year and see what happens to that block.
Report this
PaulBuffalo
Buffalo's pedestrian mall requires obvious improvements; but, spending capital without seeing a direct benefit is not prudent. Church Street Marketplace in Burlington, Vermont, is a successful pedestrian mall in a city that is colder and smaller than Buffalo. With that said, every pedestrian mall is unique and comparisons are always difficult. Successful shopping malls work diligently to remain relevant or they close. (Remember, Como/Appletree Mall in Cheektowaga?) Pedestrian malls are no different. Without continued investment, they die.
No one knows whether keeping the mall or introducing traffic will benefit the area. However, I suggest that the city open a section of Main Street to traffic temporarily as a test. Measure car traffic, foot traffic, sales at existing businesses, crime statistics, and maintenance costs; then, analyze the data.
A pedestrian mall can only succeed if it offers a unique experience. The only way for Buffalo's mall to effectively compete with Walden Galleria and its brethren is to entice non-shopping opportunities -- such as museums, events, and schools -- into the mix, too.
Report this
Texpat10
Hi Louise, we'll agree to disagree but I'd like to thank you for the civility of the discourse.
Report this
Missashe
As another Buffalo to Minneapolis transplant, I feel like I need to chime in. First of all, while my adopted town (and my hometown too) I need to point out what Mpls is not without its flaws. Downtown Minneapolis has a ways to go before it is truly vibrant. The skyways that are so prominent, while beneficial in the winter, seriously discourage pedestrian traffic. There is little to no energy at the street level, not to mention very little green space. And the skyways are abandoned after work and on the weekends. Although the population downtown is increasing, its not a 24 hr livable urban core at the moment -- right now its a center for business and an entertainment district. There is not a grocery single grocery store downtown (note, Target Flagship is not a Super Target). This is especially true for the Nicollet Mall area. It does, however, have bike lanes, don't let the images mislead you. There is a lot of planning underway to make downtown a 24hr urban neighborhood, but we are not there yet. Now, I don't bring this up to nitpick, just to point out that the Nicollet Mall in downtown Minneapolis does share some of the problems of Buffalo's Main St.
I think the biggest difference is the existence of marquee destinations on the Mall that attract people. Now, although I question some of the choices on Nicollet (see Block E), there is critical mass. To me, that is the larger issue -- do you have enough to attract people to the district? Are you nurturing and sustaining what already exists and working to lure more players into the area. The Theater District in Buffalo is great, there is such a great combination of restaurants, bars, and other entertainment options. Unfortunately, the rest of the strip has not been able to piggyback onto that energy. Before assuming that opening Main St up to traffic is a good or bad idea, I would look at the other things, including some you mentioned -- some retail (although I think a real return to downtown retail is not going to happen anywhere), green space, restaurants, housing, a sense of a place (make it a real District), etc. When I think of the real successes of downtown Mpls, Nicollet is not my first thought. I think of the Warehouse District, or now the area around Mill City/the Guthrie. These are destinations that pop and have real character, which, imho, Nicollet lacks precisely because it is so focused on big name retailers. Turn Main St into a real destination, and then figure out the best way for people to get there. Transit is vitally important, I will never argue against that, but I think you need to have a larger plan for the area before you make a transit plan. Why should people trek all the way into "scary" downtown? And not just to hit up Chippewa. What does downtown offer that Allentown, Elmwood, etc does not? For me, those are the questions that Buffalo (and Minneapolis) are struggling to address, not just for their urban cores, but for the whole region.
For some info on the planning underway for downtown Mpls (and some ideas about how the city is thinking through its approach to regionalism, it is the Twin Cities after all), check out this link: http://www.minnpost.com/steveberg/2008/01/16/583/growth_planning_minneapolis_leading_by_example
Report this
Rebecca
32% of Buffalo households do not have cars.
Report this
LastCall
Cars on Main St or Pedestrian Mall???? I choose both. The reality is that this choice is more of preference than of viability. Both work, both don't. Adding cars to main st. will not add shops, restaurants, or more condos. Demand from people and residents is the missing factor. Trees, bicycle lanes, motorists, or more attractive metro stations will not bring retail businesses downtown. People will. The growth of downtown living and the canalside development are potentially the two largest engines to bring people into the main st. area. In fact, Main St has quite a lot going for it right now: Rock bottom rents and landlords that would pay tenants to move into their long vacated space. Add this to a growing downtown community and it is clear that Main St. and the rest of Downtown Buffalo may be on the verge of a Renaissance.
Report this
simcoe
I'm too lazy to read the posts, but isn't that $50 mill just for "studies" on re-opening Main. btw, I'm going to keep harping on Pano the d-bag everywhere, his rubble lot is looking really great isn't it?
Report this
SLEEPL8
Returning cars to Main St. is far less important than getting people to live on Main St.
Report this
sbrof
"Returning cars to Main St. is far less important than getting people to live on Main St." and 50 million dollars could go a LONG way to filling the gap and bringing i would guess another half dozen buildings into fiscal reality.
Report this
CKBuffalo
The three main factors that drive any retail development are visibility, critical mass and demographics. Main Street, Buffalo has none of this to its favor in its current state.
The current push for new, upscal housing will change the demographics a bit, but not enough to warrent large retail developments, which brings in the next factor, critical mass. We need many more people to live, work and play downtown to create an area attractive to retail.
Now, if you don't know a place is there, how would you know to visit it. Cars on Main Street can help to cure the visibility problem. This is the only reason to open up Main Street to cars, and an important one.
Cure these three problems, and you will see retail in downtown.
Report this
brokeleg
Are peoples really serious about putting cars on Main? God i hope you idiots dont get your way. Gas will be $4 a gallon this summer and will keep on truckin. Cars are what killed downtown to begin with. We are the ones who destroyed an FLW masterpiece for a parking lot remember. How can people keep thinking that an auto dominated urban infrastructure is a good idea? Serious question: will you honestly go downtown and buy something at footlocker just because theres a parking spot in front of it? If enough people will ill just save my breath and move to Europe because this town is full of %#@*ing rednecks
Report this
WholeLottaJibbaJabbah
Getting people to live on main street is far less important if they don't have jobs. And I mean real jobs, not I work at the Co-op or waitress at Pano's for minimum. I mean, College educated 40k plus a year type jobs. Oh, and seriously park your damn car down a couple of blocks, you can use the extra exercise.
Report this
nick
Cities need hustle and bustle, noise and traffic. Will cars single-handedly revive Main street, of course not, but having three levels of traffic, pedestrian, auto and light rail could not hurt the street as they all can provide the critical mass needed to return the area to a semblance of life. Let's not start putting in greenery and other amenities that work on elmwood and other areas, Main street has the fabric, it should be the Main street of the city, one truly urban street. The city lacks depth, yet the street that's most developed for retail and an urban focus is nearly abandonded. If the city is to bring back urban dwellers, then the most urban of streets should function in that fashion.
Report this
hamp
I'll have to agree with the others. A picture is worth a thousand words. The photos of Nicollet mall show it to be lifeless and deadening. Where is Mary Richards when we need her?
Report this
peripatetic
I think Lincoln Avenue in Miami Beach is an example of a thriving pedestrian mall.
Report this
peripatetic
Biniszkiewicz, there weren't many people living around Easern Hills mall when it was built. Same goes for Walden Galleria, McKinley, and Boulevard. There's probably more people living near downtown than near most of those shopping "centers". Oh, Lincoln Road.
Report this
musicmanbflo
Since moving to Buffalo in '91 I've repeatedly read and heard of the need to connect the UB North Campus to downtown as part of revitalizing the downtown core. I still am not convinced that students would hop on the train and travel at least 30-45 minutes each way when they could scoot in their cars and be at the Galleria in 10, a destination with myriad ways to separate them from their parents' capital. Additionally, many of the events that draw folks downtown, e.g. Thursdays in the Square, Taste of Buffalo, Allentown Art Festival etc, all occur after the large resident student populations have gone back to their hometowns.
Having lived in both NYC and Wash DC, I'm all for a thriving urban core with a user-friendly mass transit system and pedestrian-friendly street life. I think some fine ideas are emerging and the possibilities for downtown are the best since I came here 17 years ago.
I think a downtown resident population of at least 10,000 is needed before retail can survive after business hours. Get it up to 25-30,000 and the place will start to buzz with or without cars on Main Street. People need things that stores provide, and stores provide things people need - the key being 'people.'
Report this
sbrof
it takes 12 minutes to go 5 miles from Allen-Medical Campus to UB South, North campus is a straight shop 3 miles away, It would take no longer than 10 minutes, probably less if you didn't put in any stations initially. That would connect students to downtown in probably 20 minutes.
They take the bus to south campus 15 minutes, and walk another 5 - 10 to the bars on Main. I guarantee that many students would take it downtown to get into the action of Chippewa.
Report this
RisingDamp666
They called it a pedestrian mall when they simply closed off a street to autos. That means that something built for cars got closed off in hopes that all these pedestrians would swarm over the road. How ridiculous is that? If you want pedestrians, build something specifically for them: lots of human scale amenities, street furniture and stimulating things to see and do along the way. Main Street falls way way short of this and a windswept transit plaza does little to affect that. The cars have to come back and if Buffalonians want a pedestrian Shangri-La, that can be properly planned and constructed elsewhere.
Report this
GDC
Having cars with the trains and bike lanes will most definitely bring more life to Main Street at all hours. I've walked down Main Street after hours and quiet weekends to hear NOTHING but the wind, so alittle auto traffic would make a difference. With the growing population of residence and new businesses, Retail shall follow along with the Waterfront Developments. Remember, if Bass Pro opens up, it shall lead a trend of other big Retailers to move in to the area and start a "Destination" of retail again. Main street has the potential and space for retail again, mixed in with unique cafe's and restaurants, it's only a matter of time and investments.
Report this
beethoven81
Couple of points I would like to make....1) People keep talking about how the light rail is needed to connect UB Amherst to downtown...well, as a UB student I can tell you that the vast majority of students (just look at their parking lots) have cars or are friends with someone who has a car, UB students are not in desperate need of public transportation to get downtown. Plenty of them do so without the light rail on saturday nights at Chipewa. 2) YES cars are needed on main street. Maybe if you live in the city you know of main street, but people who live in the suburbs and come to the city know of delaware and elmwood and can easily drive there. No one from Orchard Park is going to drive a nigth to some small side street, park, and walk around a desolate street like main street is now just because a retail store was opened there or because some new trees were planted. 3) Most of the city people who do not have a car do not have so because they can not afford one...these people are not going to be spending alot of money in retail shops on Main, if that was not the case then the main place mall should be booming right now with business. 4) Buffalo like the vast majority of cities in this country are car cities....people in much larger cities like chicago and LA use cars to get around, its a fact of life and its no coincedence that Main is dead because there is no traffic, try walking down Main street by yourself at 1 AM...its dead and preety darn scary. If there was traffic cars would be driving up and down and business would open up. One of the selling points of retail store locations is the car traffic, it equals visibility. There is no visibility on Main street, if you do not already happen to know of business there you are not just going to find out about it by driving by. Someone can open a store on Elmowood and people will see it when they go by. Also, living on mains street. Opening up Main to cars won't solve all its problems, its just one step of many others...but it is one step that will need to be taken. Maybe when buffalo's population is 1 million people then we can think about closing off streets to traffic.
Report this
NewBuffalo
lets face it, Americans are fat and lazy. They MUST drive to go one mile. Get rid of the mall and open up to traffic. Add a drive thru as well, fries with your fat burger?
Report this
simcoe
A couple of things.... Those pics above are really nice but I can't help but notice the lack of people, maybe they were taken on a Sun morning. And, if anyone thinks that the light rail will ever be exteneded to Amherst is outside of this reality. If anything the town would rather erect a Great Wall of Amherst to keep city folk out.
Report this
MJWorthington
yes...chuck $50 mill to reopen it cars so it can thrive like the rest of Main St. North of it ;) there's enough room for cars as is. Just allow cars (police, shuttles, lost people are routinly dirving down it already). Allow only right hand turns off of it and no-standing. See what happens initially and then decide to move forward with dedicated car lanes/drop off cutouts etc.
I still personally feel the bigger bang for the buck would be applying the money to tax-breaks/gap-financing etc for new build/rehab mixed use with hidden self contained parking along the current setup. At the end we would have more people down there. Also to removing the current stops for more useful, more transparent stops. At the end of this plan our only certainty is that cars will be allowed to drive past the empty buildings/40 year old shovel ready lots
Report this
tommyBluez
From Billo:
" while downtown parking is scarce and needs to be addressed"
Are you high? Buffalo is MORE THAN 50% SURFACE PARKING. That's rediculous for a city.
Report this
billo
Tommy - OK , not the strongest point on my part regarding parking. I couldn't agree more that the amount of surface parking downtown is appalling. I only made that point to acknowledge that something had to be done about the overall parking situation, as the author of the orignal post seems concerned that if main were opened to traffic it would be a problem without significant room for on/off street parking.
It's great that some cities have had success with these types of pedestrian malls - Buffalo has not. Trying to solve Main Street's current problems without bringing back vehicular traffic is an exercise in futility. Move on. If vehicle traffic on Main st is not an viable option then put the time, effort, and money into other parts of the city/downtown and stop wasting resources on a proven loser.
Report this
theacorn
I cannot take the time to skim all the posts but as long as Mayor Brown and the Common Council of Buffalo feel that everyone who comes downtown should have to pay a parking fee or parking ticket for the privilege of visiting an empty city center then downtown will remain empty. The stores and restaurants did not close because they wanted to disappoint customers standing in line at their doors but they closed when there were no customers. I lived for over twenty years on the border of downtown and watched the change from 1980 on. The only growth industry downtown was parking enforcement. This downtown is so barren that it cannot even support a fast food outlet anymore. Shopping and dining are usually personal social events and it is too bad the city leaders think that you should pay for that event. Tax breaks for the merchants are not going to work either. If you doubt these sentiments then ask one of the malls in the suburbs to institute a parking fee and fines for their parking lots.
Report this
DJB
Is the problem the availability of parking or the fact you must pay for it? It certainly isn't free in most North American cities. It is incredibly expensive to park in Toronto, but people pay and retail is successful. The same is true for most cities. People will pay to park if the area has something worthwhile. I agree that it can be a deterrent for some, but there is too much being made of this. People don't go downtown to shop because there is nothing there, not because they can't find a place to park or they have to pay $1.00. Hopefully, more and more people will move closer to downtown and there will be success with the Inner Harbor Project. Retailers don't spend millions of dollars investing in an area because they want to help the region. They do it to make money and if they don't believe the investment is worth it, they won't open a store. Although parking is one component, Buffalo has enough to sustain retail. What it doesn't have is a the critical mass downtown.
Report this
magnum
As more people move downtown and gas prices approaching $4.00/gal, maybe we should nott cater to the car mentality. Having cars on Main street won't do shiate for downtown shopping. Jobs and people living nearby will make the difference. Suburban malls didn't spring up because people couldn't drive down main street. Figures it would take an out-of-towner to think outside the box for us.
Report this
Rebecca
It takes 1500 residents to support one block of retail. Residents come first, services follow.
Beethoven - as a UB student, I can't agree with your assessment of car ownership. Maybe the students you keep company with all have cars but that doesn't mean they all do. Also, that does not take into account the people that felt they HAD to buy a car once they got here.
There is nothing wrong with decreasing the need for cars. We could start by having sidewalks that lead off/on campus.
Report this