The Future Of Buffalo's Main Street

I was wondering how the community feels about the renewed push to introduce traffic back to the Main Street Pedestrian Mall. Currently, I live in the Minneapolis, MN area (although desperately missing Buffalo) which has a large, thriving Pedestrian Mall in the downtown core called Nicollet Mall. While there are a number of minor differences between the two pedestrian malls, I believe that our leadership may be making a HUGE mistake by initiating a long-term project to bring automobiles back to this district.
First, let me point out a few of the differences between the Buffalo and Minneapolis Malls...
- While the Nicollet Mall does not include the city's light rail line, it limits traffic to public transportation (buses and taxis only). The light rail line is situated at the north end of the mall.
- All of the streets that cross the Nicollet Mall have remained open, allowing vehicular traffic to cross at each block. This is unlike Buffalo, where many cross streets were blocked from crossing Main either due to the light rail project or others such as the Main Place Mall.
- Residential and commercial development in the Minneapolis core has help support this district on a 24/7 basis. While some strides have been made in bringing residents back to downtown Buffalo, much more is needed to support a thriving community.
Other than this, many of the characteristics are the same. Both pedestrian malls are in close proximity to major arenas (Target Center in MN/HSBC in Buffalo), both are close to their respective convention centers and hotels and both have designated shopping space, although the quality of shopping is much better in Minneapolis.
I just recently had the chance to compare these two destinations as I was home in Buffalo and walked around the Main Place Mall on Saturday, 3/15/08. I was back in MN and then went to the Nicollet Mall the following week on 3/22/08. While the character of Buffalo's architecture far exceeds that in Minneapolis, it is sad to see all of the boarded up and underutilized structures along this major stretch. While there were more people than I expected to see downtown that Saturday, very few were residents that were shopping, dining or enjoying what downtown had to offer (other than those skating at Fountain Plaza). Along the way, I stopped into the Main Place mall for a cup of coffee and luckily entered the shop just before they closed at 3PM to get my cup o' joe. Being from Buffalo, I was not surprised that the shop was closing at 3PM, but couldn't help myself from thinking what others from outside the Buffalo area must think when in town for a weekend.
During my stroll down Nicollet Mall, the experience was very different. There were many people out and almost all of the shops and restaurants were open for business. New residential development was sprouting up on every corner, so it seemed. When I wanted a cup of coffee, I had numerous choices.... should I go to Starbucks (NO!), Caribou or Dunn Brothers (local is better!)? If so, which one of the 20 should I go to? I was also able to shop at Target, Macy's and hundreds of other shops.
Don't get me wrong, I realize that Minneapolis and Buffalo are very different cities. Minneapolis is home to several Fortune 500 companies and has a fairly proficient government managing itself. But, that is kind of my point. It isn't a lack of vehicular traffic that killed Main Street in downtown Buffalo. Main Street was the victim of Buffalo's economic decline in the 70s, 80s and 90s. I would argue that whether traffic was removed or not, the situation would be very similar. As Buffalo's fortunes change, so will Main Street's.
While it it easy for politicians to blame the lack of traffic and champion themselves as the ones that will save Main Street by bringing back traffic, I think if it is done, it will be as big of a blunder as the Main Place Mall or any other "Urban Renewal" project Buffalo has implemented in the past.
Main Street offers Buffalo a unique opportunity that most other cities do not have. By increasing residential development, adding additional green space, opening as many closed cross streets as possible over Main Street and improving vehicular traffic flow in all other areas of downtown, Buffalo can create a truly unique urban experience that will not only support itself, but be a destination for area residents and visitors alike.

Comment Options
al-alo
pedestrians, streetcars (or in our case light rail) and autos had shared streets for decades in Buffalo. in other cities, the same shared streets have existed for over a century. i really dont see it as too much of a problem.
what does worry me is the streetscaping that will eliminate the theatre stop. or like short sighted changes and psuedo-upgrades.
Report this
NewBuffalo
traffic is essential on this street. This should be the Main drag in the city. A ped mall belongs in another area. This street will only thrive with traffic. Go down chippewa any nice night, tons of people and cars. We live in a society that loces our cars. A ped mall would work better in waterfront village or the up and coming cobblestone district. main st is right off the 33 and other highways and needs to be traffic friendly. SORRY but true.
Report this
vgs
Aside from taking out the Convention Center, Hyatt and Main Place mall those streets are not going to open...ever and that is too bad because it would be incredibly beneficial to bringing life back to those corners. Downtown is too linear and the cross streets are essentially useless except for Chippewa, such as it is.
Report this
nyc
Yes, same with Denver - a thriving pedestrian mall downtown. It had more to do with the local economy and the density of housing then whether there are cars driving down Main Street. And both Minn. and Denver are cold weather cities so clearly it's not weather related.
Report this
SLEEPL8
Is Minneapolis an indoor pedestrian mall? Or am I thinking of another city that actually has the street covered by glass to keep folks out of the "the elements" I am not suggesting an indoor pedestrian mall for Buffalo because the cost would be insane and there are other better things to be done with that amount of money (waterfront). I agree that providing residential opportunity on Main St. should be priority #1. If enough people live DT maybe vehicle traffic won't be necessary but for now I think rail and roads together is the best idea.
Report this
mpitman
I've been to MPLS many times and I too am impressed with the success of the Nicollet mall. Even more impressive especially during the COLD Twin Cities winters) is the downtown network of connecting bridges and overpasses that allow workers and residents indoor access to much of downtown, including many shops, restaurants, hotels, etc. Many aspects of downtown MPLS could indeed serve as models for redeveloping Buffalo.
Report this
onestarmartin
I agree, I do not see how cars will make any difference. More houseing [for a few thousan not hundred] and destination spots to increase density will help downtown. If they want cars they should wait and see what Main Street is like once the many, MANY empty building are revitalized on Main and surrounding streets. Denver, Miami etc all have busy functioning pedestrian malls. At the moment opening up Main will just give the office workers another escape route other than Franklin at 5pm.
Report this
GTsnowracer
nyc--
I was actually going to comment on Denver as an example of what _not_ to do. Maybe it was the time that I was there, but I thought the pedestrian mall in Denver was just horrible. It did certainly have more retail than our main street, but most of it was closed (this was a Sunday afternoon) The only people out were...well, not the kind of people who would be visiting those establishments anyway. I really got the impression that the only people who used the pedestrian mall would be people who drove in from the suburbs to work in their office downtown, then went out to lunch there. Nobody was there on the weekend and the city felt very un-livable.
SLEEPL8 -
I think you might be thinking of Duluth, MN, which has indoor pedestrian walkways on its main downtown street. It might be comparable to our main street, but most of the good bars/restaurants in Duluth are across the highway on the waterfront Canal Park.
Report this
mpitman
SLEEPL8, see my earlier post. You actually are thinking of the overhead walkway network in downtown MPLS. Nicollet Mall is a street level ped mall similar to Buffalo's (but with thriving businesses every block).
Report this
gahumbert
Traffic or not, Main Street down town will not work if there is no reason to go there. The shops are almost non-existent (and no, CVS is not a destination), the eateries and drink shops the same. Chippewa, Allen, Elmwood all work because there is stuff to see, shop, eat and drink. Main Place Mall is a dump and offers nothing to potential shoppers. Get some real businesses downtown (and Starbucks would be OK, don't beat them up because they are not local) and the people will follow.
Report this
gahumbert
Traffic or not, Main Street down town will not work if there is no reason to go there. The shops are almost non-existent (and no, CVS is not a destination), the eateries and drink shops the same. Chippewa, Allen, Elmwood all work because there is stuff to see, shop, eat and drink. Main Place Mall is a dump and offers nothing to potential shoppers. Get some real businesses downtown (and Starbucks would be OK, don't beat them up because they are not local) and the people will follow.
Report this
PaulBuffalo
Here in the LosAngeles area, Santa Monica has the Third Street Promenade. Las Vegas has the Fremont Street Experience. Third Street is essentially an open air mall. There is plentiful parking in lots on the adjacent streets. Fremont Street is also an open air environment, but a canopy overhead protects against the intense heat. Both are successful.
I'm a supporter of pedestrian malls, but Buffalo's was built at the wrong time. Since the mall was built, there has not been one improvement to keep it interesting. This is typical of Buffalo's history: when faced with challenge, just tear it down. Rather than remove the mall and reintroduce traffic, find ways to make this mall a unique environment. Now may be the right time.
Report this
Dan
GTsnowracer> I really got the impression that the only people who used the pedestrian mall would be people who drove in from the suburbs to work in their office downtown, then went out to lunch there. Nobody was there on the weekend and the city felt very un-livable.
I lived in Denver for four years, and what you wrote about that city's downtown, and its livability, is certainly not true. Yes, there were homeless teens on the mall (mostly in a plaza a few blocks east of Larimer Square), but they were far outnumbered by most others. The mall has a good deal of pedestrian traffic day and night throughout the week, except maybe for late on Sunday. Buskers and drum circles aplenty, too. It's a regional destination, but then again downtown Denver is surrounded on three sides by prosperous or gentrifying residential areas. Unlike the majority of cities in the US, the city of Denver is more affluent than its surrounding suburbs. Denver's population is also very young, educated, and active.
With dry, sunny weather throughout most of the year, and mild winters (except for the occasional blizzard), Denver's 16th Street Mall is a natural draw. Pedestrian malls in nearby Boulder and Fort Collins are also crowded and full of street life.
Check out denverinfill.com/subpages_special_topics/16th_street_mall.htm , for what the mall is like on a SATURDAY.
Report this
Texpat10
I think that people in Buffalo have the chicken and the egg reversed. It is't that there is no retail on Main because of the pedestrian mall. The pedestrian mall is not successful because there is no retail. And there is no retail because of the economy and shifts in retail trends/consolidition in the industry.
One factor to consider in these comparisons is the size of the metropolitan area. Both Denver and Minneapolis are several times larger than Buffalo. They are wealthier, have more downtown residents and home to more business. This cycle feeds off itself and in-turn brings retail. Buffalo needs to grow its economy and downtown resident base before much good will come to Main.
I, too, visited the pedestrian mall on a recent Saturday. It was a forlorn and vaguely menacing experience. The metrorail stations are dated, rusted and becoming decrepit. Seeing the trains roll down the street was very cool though, and added a uniqueness to the experience; something I don't think cars would do. The streets parallel to Main certainly were not overflowing with traffic. Rather than bringing cars back I think the city should focus on improving the streetscape., modernizing the stations and planting trees, flowers and grass instead of the painted asphalt that is currently there. If cars were already there I wouldn't advocate removing them but I just don't think it is money well spent on bringing them back.
Report this
STEEL
The Mall did not cause the decline of Main Street (though it might have pushed it along a bit) But the Mall will prevent it form ever coming back. Main Street right now is out of sight out of mind to most people and that means death to most retail.
Chicago had a buses only mall on State Street that was removed about 10 years ago. It was a miserable failure. State Street today is packed with people.
Report this
rubygreta
I never liked the much ballyhooed downtown mall on State Street in Ithaca. Every time I visit there are a ton of vacancies, and the overall quality of the stores is not great. You can't have open a nice coffee shop because nobody in a hurry going to work is going to park their car in a garage, feed the meter, and walk to the shop, especially in bad weather. And the mall attracts vagrants like flies.
Ithaca would be better off opening the street and creating diagonal parking (probably a couple of hundred spaces). On spring, summer and fall weekends, they could close off State Street to cars and have festival days, just like they do in New York City. Buffalo could do the same.
Report this
allthingsbuffalo
only high density can make a successful pedestrian mall. Minneapolis' city population is in the millions and has a rather strong downtown core so its much easier to pull it off same with miami and denver obviously...but the fact that it does have one proves that its not the weather that is holding buffalo's main street back.
buffalo doesn't have the density to pull off a pedestrian mall. cars won't cure it but it will make it slightly more appealing to potential retail establishments.
Report this
JohnnyWalker
Nicolett mall in downtown Minneapolis was only slightly less dead than main place mall last time I was there on business. I just don't think you can conceptualize what a vibrant downtown is like, if your expeience is limited to Buffalo and Minneapolis, or Denver for that matter. Match those towns to Philadelphia, Boston, New York, Chicago, San Francisco, or Seattle.
Report this
simcoe
My post didn't post. Why? This well oiled machine is slowing down. There were about 280 ped malls created during the 70's the majority of them have been retrofitted to allow traffic.
Report this
RhodeIslandBoy
I've said this for a long time, but take a portion of the ridiculous $50 million plus that is going to be spent on returning cars to Main Street and give it to businesses to open on Main Street and you would have a thriving scene on the pedestrian mall. Cars are not going to change a thing on Main Street downtown.
Report this
sbrof
Minneapolis St Paul has a regional government or at least a tax sharing structure. This means that those people who run away from the city are still supporting it. This dissuades people from running away from problems and actually forces them to fix them because in the end you are still going to have to pay.. HUGE difference than Buffalo which was left to fend for itself and basically became the teet which the region sucked the life out of.
The pedestrian mall in buffalo is NOT the reason businesses and people left. It was the lack of continued investment, the fleeing of tax payer dollars. Sorry but cars are no the solution. Look at Main Street north of the mall, even worse conditions all the way to the University District or Pearl, Genesee, Ellicott, Washington, Boradway, Walden, Sycamore.. all these roads have cars none of them are thriving... the missing link is people living downtown and a region that doesn't rob peter to pay paul.
Report this
RisingDamp666
"Minneapolis's city population is in the millions"? Not quite. The city has a population of around 370,000, down from their 1950 high of over 520,000. The metro indeed has over 3 million people, but with the declining urban core and the wealth of suburban options, this comparison is really not that bad. I can't help but think that the difference is rooted in both cities' urban character. Buffalo lost most of its highly skilled and talented residents to the suburbs decades ago. Minneapolis maintained a core population of these people, even though many of the city's neighborhoods saw a decline. The nature of those Fortune 500 companies in Minneapolis also speaks volumes. They are the Honeywells and the IDS Financials that attract the best educated and most highly skilled. Buffalo was a blue collar town that rode the fortunes of basic industry, both up and down. Mass Transit isn't the issue, the issue is who is riding those rails. Two similar towns, two very different resident profiles.
Report this
tzone
Wow. I don't really get the "desperately missing buffalo" vibe after reading about how great the downtown pedestrian mall is in MPLS. Target and a Starbucks? In a walkable downtown mall with local stores too? I'd be there. Regularly.
I remember talking with a friend in MPLS a few years ago about how they were building a light rail, and we had a discussion about how Buffalo's was one of the few worldwide seen as a failure in terms of bringing business and development to the targeted areas. He couldn't believe that was possible.
More importantly, what's up with bringing two-way traffic back to Tupper directly in-front of the 33? Has no one from the DOT ever been on that road packed with two lanes at rush hour? Is that to help suburban folks coming into the city find the way around? Like our last bizarrely planned un-one-waying downtown?
Report this
sbrof
What our mall needs is a little reworking not a deconstruction. Bring back ALL the cross streets so people can get dropped of at the corner of the block they want to go to. This would alleviate 90% of the car issues. As soon as you bring access to the front door of an establishment people are going to complain because they can't park there putting demand on businesses and institutions to demolish their neighbor to serve themselves. Just wait and see. as soon as cars come back to main the next thing those businesses will complain about is parking close parking.
It is a downtown, a city, you park and walk. Nobody who wants to park in front of their store would ever venture downtown when they could already go to a suburban location for the same stuff.
Also those huge ugly transit stations need to go. They are visual blockades of the street.
next bring the buses down main. they should have access to Main Street and would increase the life for any businesses. look at the North Division / South Division buss turn around. Probably the busiest place in all of downtown.
Lastly we need to continue to build density of people in and near downtown. We need students, workers and residents. only then will retail come back. Cars don't bring in retail, money and people do.
Report this
al-alo
perhaps there is a positive side effect of returning auto traffic to main.
if the project is well executed (i know, i know), this could prove to the region that a streetcar style operation is feasible on other city streets - can you say south park or hertel/elmwood etc . . .?
Report this
reflip
It's a pedestrian mall with no pedestrians. The worst that can happen by opening it back up to traffic is that the city spends money with no direct, easy to predict outcome. However, things can't get worse. Turn it back into one of those new-fangled "streets" all these urban planners keep talking about and it will then just be another street, open for development.
If we "stay the course", things will remain as they are. If we open it up to cars, at least there is a chance of improvement. As of now, the place is not a destination. Nobody is going there just to go there. With car traffic, at least people will be passin' through. That in itself is an improvement. In this case, cars = people. That might not immediately translate into investment, but at least now there is something to work with. There will still be sidewalks and storefronts and apartments. At times occupied, at times not. It will be like the rest of Main Street, for better or worse. But even that is better than the current condition.
But as always, it depends on the plans...
Report this
nyc
If Canalside happens, the waterfront would become a significant pedestrian area. That would have a bigger impact on Main Street then would returning cars. In fact it should be made as easy as possible to park in a garage at canalside and travel up main street to the theater district or elsewhere by metrorail. I would not want to see metro rail sevice diminished or made less convienent just at a time when we are putting significant retail and parking at one end of the fare free zone. It could benefit the entire Main Street Corridor if it was percived as an easy link. I could imagine parking right off the 1-90 in a garage associated with canalside, shopping there, and then taking free metrorail uptown to the theater district to have dinner. Concentrate parking at canalside and use metrorail to allow access to all of downtown for retail and entertainment purposes, with Canalside at the core. There is a nice logic to the way Main Street is organized and Buffalo should take advantage of it.
Report this
benfranklin
There's traffic at Main and Virginia, but the first floor retail of the Granitework's remains empty. Further, as gas goes ever higher, any solution dependent on driving seems a bit, well, out of touch with our current circumstance. Putting traffic back on Main might help, but it smells of politicians grasping at a 'let's just do something' solution. Problems on Main (and with Buffalo more generally) may have worsened during the time period that cars were removed from Main, suggesting causation however, I think we'd all agree, is a little too simplistic.
Report this
buffalostan
This may be crazy but it seems that like for $50,000,000 someone could invent some kind of a time machine to switch some things around like stopping the mall going in in the first place. Thats allot of moneys someone could do it.
Report this
tonyarmani
The future of Main st. is as clear as the picture associated with this post...
Main st, as well as all of the other problems Buffalo faces, can be solved with the removal of three things:
1. Unions 2. High Taxes 3. Inefficient Politicians
Report this
vgs
there is no retail or activity for that matter on Delaware (except near chip), franklin, pearl or washington so why would main be any different becasue of cars, main street is just a microcosim of Buffalo: desolate and void of any vitality. With that said I still say spend the money to bring cars back, something has to spur change.
Report this
Dan
Radical idea ... a sales tax-free zone for retail uses downtown.
Naaaah. It'd never happen.
Report this
Dan
Radical idea ... a sales tax-free zone for retail uses downtown.
Naaaah. It'd never happen. They could never give up the 8% from wig sales.
Report this
simcoe
Tony- Wait, how do you know such things? What revelatory angel bespoke these divine words to you? The removal of those three little things will solve ALL of Buffalo's problems. I'll take number 3, who wants 1 and 2?
Report this
sbrof
Agreed but 50 mill could change the stations, reconnect the roads and still have money left over to fill in some gap financing to renovate the graystone / 500 blocks etc... The problem isn't the lack of money it is wasting money to pretty up a street when we should be spending money where the end results have a better potential to spur / attract business.
Report this
wizardofza
Dan has a good point in his first comment. Downtown Buffalo is almost completely surrounded by low-income neighborhoods and desolate industrial areas.
I look a walk down this "pedestrian mall" the other day and boy is it a mess. The only people walking down it were the types of folks businesses try to avoid like the plague.
The ped-mall concept was taken to the extreme on Main St. when it was built decades ago. When successfully implemented in other cities, it usually involved a narrow side (read: NOT Main) street and only for a couple blocks or so to create an intimate small-scale environment with small destination shops, pedestrian malls were not supposed to be places on wide, gaping thoroughfares with towering buildings. As usual Buffalo planning morons took an idea that might have worked somewhere else, perverted the hell out of it, and completely fucked up our cityscape in the process of implementing it.
I like to have a normal Main St. back thank you.
Report this
Downtownjunkie
We need to reconnect the sidestreets in Buffalo. There are currently several deadzones in the city thanks to the Main place mall, the convention center and the Hyatt. Why would our leaders ever agree to sell off our streets to the highest bidder? I think that these mistakes should be thought of as another factor for the failure of the downtown mall. Also wasn't the pedestrian mall once apart of a even greater plan to bring lightrail to the suburbs and make it convenient to shop and work downtown? This never happened unless you think of the UB south campus as the suburbs so should we really be surprised that the benefits our leaders promised at the time never materialized? And as for the current light-rail system especially currently during the high gas times I think a total rehab of the entire system including all of the stations and surrounding areas along with maybe the addition of a few more stations along the current line would do wonders for increasing ridership. The NFTA needs to come up with a plan which included new schedules to reflect the changing downtown. This article really opened my eyes as to the absurdity of blaming a pedestrian mall for the death of main street. MAybe main place and the convention center played a role but the pedestrian mall argument cannot really be backed up.
Report this
phenimore
I think that Buffalo Place does a great job in creating a hospitable environment for business downton. Have you seen how extensive the gardening is down there in the summer? It's really very nice. I think bringing traffic back to Main would just be a waste of money. I can't see how it would help produce more business than any of the neighboring streets that are open to traffic! Washington, Pearl, Delaware, Frankln, This area is ripe for re-use and the current trends in Buffalo hopefully spread out. I think the mall would be a great place for another sports bar much like Pearl Street. Buffalo seems to have an endless appetite for that kind of thing. (even the suburbanites!) I would reccomend a Target if we didn't have 7 already in the area...
Report this
Aloha
I read somewhere once that the pedestrian mall was originally envisioned to be somewhat park-like, with trees and flower beds and benches, and even patches of grass where that red-painted pavement is. It seems like the mall was not built the way it was supposed to be, and we ended up with a half completed idea. There are some trees and planters, but it's a far cry from anything remotely park-like.
Report this
Aloha
I read somewhere once that the pedestrian mall was originally envisioned to be somewhat park-like, with trees and flower beds and benches, and even patches of grass where that red-painted pavement is. It seems like the mall was not built the way it was supposed to be, and we ended up with a half completed idea. There are some trees and planters, but it's a far cry from anything remotely park-like.
Report this
MJWorthington
I agree on the $50mil. This is another silver bullet to save Main St. Do we forget that the Pedestrian Mall was supposed to save it once upon a time? Obviously it was already dieing.
But the $50 Mil into:
1) tax breaks/credit offsets for new new residential mixed use projects along the Mall (rental and condo). Get more people living there and occupying the space on a daily buisness. Offer unique amenities such as roof top patios etc to create something unique.
2) Remove the overly large rail stations that just block the sidewalks and hide everything that is beyond them
3)Open up the cross streets to traffic with only stop signs and maybe some train signs for those too dense to realize on their own not to pull in front of a train.
Give this time to work and push programs that support its success. If after a decade or two it is still deemed that traffic is necessary then try to move on it. I fail to recall any programs to make this thing work from the start. It was built and left there. Liike any product it needs to be marketed, sold, and given incentives to invest around. And like most active urban areas it needs to continue to diversify its offerings (retail, buisness, entertainment, residential, etc.)
I to owould point to Main St north of here. The Automobile has not done it any favors up to this point.
Report this
Vince_Red
This is an interesting discussion. I think that Metro Rail is one of the best things about Buffalo. The subway is marvelous, and something that Denver and Minneapolis are never likely to have, but the design of the above-ground downtown stations and the pedestrian mall is and always has been just awful. The colors, the materials--none of it has ever worked.
From the beginning it looked like the cheezy interior of a shopping mall, and it has gotten worse with age. Main Place is awful, too. I remember the mall being vibrant in its early years, but it never related to the street well and is now just depressing. And then there is that convention center. I understand it works pretty well on the inside but on the outside it is, as Alvira Gulch would say, "a menace to the community." Despite all this, it's still downtown Buffalo, which remains beautiful in its bedraggled state, a unique and tainted treasure.
There are some pedestrian malls in the U.S. that have worked, but most haven't, and I'm afraid that this one never will. I am a dyed-in-the-wool pedestrian and think that Buffalo is, in part, a great city to walk around in but, nonetheless, would vote for bringing the cars back.
Report this
LarkinLot
We’re not Minneapolis! The fact is the pedestrian mall here is a failure. 20 plus years is enough. I work downtown. Main Street is a disgrace and an embarrassment. The worst mistake is not fixing a known mistake. Cars back on Main St. now!
Report this
sbrof
I think a part of the argument to bring main street back to cars is to help alleviate the confusion that many drivers feel is downtown. I think that this is a very valid argument but one that could be solved by reconnecting the side streets and finishing the job of removing the one way streets.
Lets take this is steps. Reconnecting the streets, finish making all downtown streets that should be two way - two way again and go from there. Spending such a huge amount of money to get just a reworked street without anything else is just asking to be a pretty flop.
Report this
GDC
I can picture Main Street open to traffic again with the Metro Rail (Look at Toronto, San Fran that have the trolly system with auto traffic). And a push for more living, commerical, and retail in this area. When we see a change and updated Main Street, it shall spure interests as a "Place to Be" again.
Report this
tonyarmani
simcoe - i dont know if it was an angel, prophet, magic 8ball, 1st grader, or playing simcity too much when i was young, but all sources point to yes
Report this
chris69
All this talk may be for nothing because Buffalo is less than a year away from an economic earthquake which very likely will change everything as we know it. What economic earthquake? Well the opening of the Federal Courthouse and the opening of the Buffalo Creek Casino/Hotel Complex.
Once they open the Chippewa vomit district is going to see 2 things happen. First that the new 24hour district is now the area surrounding the Casino. Second that the Chippewa vomit district is to close to the government district....and those businesses will slowly relocate out of the Chippewa District.
Of course the same thing is going to happen with the Convention Center also. There is going to be alot of pressure by Snyder to keep it for the Hyatt but there is going to be even more pressure for it to relocate so the growing government/court district has room to grow possibly for another office building.
Of course the Hyatt would have been wise to follow the Dulski and simply convert to a smaller hotel, along with residences and office space....which is what their going to end up doing anyway.
Lastly comes Main Place Mall one of the biggest problems for downtown Buffalo which can only be solved by demolishing half of it, building a companion tower at the opposite end and reopening some of the streets with pass thrus while the 2nd and 3rd floors quite possibly could be rebuilt
Then of course there are big question marks over at the Statler and an even bigger question over Issas City Tower but save that for another discussion. The point is that downtown as we know it is about to undergo a huge shift which is going to reopen alot of opportunity to rethink downtown and reconnecting the street grid, as well as development opportunities to correct past mistakes.
But so far, we are not connecting the waterfront streets to Niagara Street and we are not reconnecting the downtown grid...people think these designs are good but long term they do not serve the city.
Report this
Dan
wizardofza> Dan has a good point in his first comment. Downtown Buffalo is almost completely surrounded by low-income neighborhoods and desolate industrial areas.
That, and water. As they say among the retail site selection crowd, "fish don't shop".
Let's compare the surroundings of downtown Denver with Buffalo.
Denver: North: Five Points (small African-American neighborhood that is gentrifying) East: City Park West, Park Hill, Capitol Hill, Cheesman Park (high-density middle and upper income neighborhoods with a very large gay/bohemian/urban professional population) South: CU Denver, gentrifying neighborhoods (Baker, etc) West: LoDo (expensive lofts), Central Platte Valley (expensive lofts), Highlands/West Highlands (post-gentrification affluence)
Buffalo: North: scattered loft apartments, West Village (still struggling), Lower West Side (ouch), Allentown (very slow gentrification) East: Lower East Side (urban prairie/ghetto), First Ward (industrial and lower income residential) South: scattered loft apartments, Buffalo River, vacant land, abandoned grain mills West: Lake Erie, Niagara River
Report this
Dan
I curse BR's lack of recognition of single carriage returns! Let me try that again
wizardofza> Dan has a good point in his first comment. Downtown Buffalo is almost completely surrounded by low-income neighborhoods and desolate industrial areas.
That, and water. As they say among the retail site selection crowd, "fish don't shop".
Let's compare the surroundings of downtown Denver with Buffalo.
Denver:
North: Five Points (small African-American neighborhood that is gentrifying)
East: City Park West, Park Hill, Capitol Hill, Cheesman Park (high-density middle and upper income neighborhoods with a very large gay/bohemian/urban professional population)
South: CU Denver, gentrifying neighborhoods (Baker, etc)
West: LoDo (expensive lofts), Central Platte Valley (expensive lofts), Highlands/West Highlands (post-gentrification affluence; I bought my very first house in West Highlands in 1999, and could never afford to move back)
Buffalo:
North: scattered loft apartments, West Village (still struggling), Lower West Side (ouch), Allentown (very slow gentrification)
East: Lower East Side (urban prairie/ghetto), First Ward (industrial and lower income residential)
South: scattered loft apartments, Buffalo River, vacant land, abandoned grain mills
West: Waterfront Village (well-off but low population) Lake Erie, Niagara River
Report this
bison716
BUILD THE STREETS!!! Main Street needs to be.... a MAIN STREET! Houston's Main St. is beautiful, and well lit, with both car and train traffic full of people actually walking with great restaurants, clubs, apartments, lofts, and all sorts of businesses (small and large corporations). No businesses are in our Main St. because no cars can get there! Who would want to start a business (lets say a great cafe) with no incoming car traffic? It just makes sense to invest into building lanes for cars. BUILD and I bet you investors will take a second look into starting a business in that part of downtown. Once a few start the rest will come pouring in (ex. Chippewa).
Heres some pics I found of what Buffalo's Main Street could look like and function!
http://world.nycsubway.org/perl/showpix?bnN5c3RlbT00M3wwfDR8MjB8fFA9L3VzL2hvdXN0b24vaW5kZXguaHRtbHxuc3Rh
Report this
impressingagent
how about they spend the money to connect Ub? The lack of traffic is kind of a polite thing, the only problem is that we don't have the critical mass. There are a bunch of projects that should really happen before this one. The Genesee block, the 500 block,dulski-issa block, the courthouse,the casino, heck.. even the inner harbor. It just seems like this kind of change is premature. If people don't shop because they can't get there, well how strong is there interest anyway?
Report this
JohnMarko
A few comments:
I think the expense and time and effort to put traffic back on the relatively NEW mall is a BIG MISTAKE. We are TOO IMPATIENT!
The streetscape I saw right after it opened was VERY disappointing - especially in light of all the hullabaloo I heard. They should have used nice pavers ALL ACROSS THE STREET FROM BUILDING TO BUILDING - who was the iidiot who thought raked concrete was attractive - they just removed the street and re-created a carless STREET, not a PEDESTRIAN pathway...it's almost as bad as the Fort Street Mall in Honolulul - same ugly concrete with NO imagination - and that's in "Paradise"!!!
The stations were deliberately an attempt to look "old" - and I guess this is the ONLY thing that worked - TOO WELL from the comments I see here - I was wondering how long those pipes would be maintained and begin to rust and look like they should be another "project"...
The stations BLOCK the streetscape - that's for sure - VERY ugly - why couldn't they find a couple storefronts in proximity to the "stations" for people top wait at - they could have leased out "coffee shops" and the like to the waiting passengers...
The decline of the population and the failure of retail BEFORE the mall's instigation is THE factor why it's "dead"...the city should be a little more patient and see what happens when/if all the new residential development is IN PLACE...
Freemont street works only because of all the MANY Casinos that line it - walk a few feet up to the end and it's just as dead and ugly and populated with all the "undesirables" that everyone complains about...and it only works because of the infusion of MILLIONS by the city government - and many of the non-casino establishments have FAILED and are still trying to be worked out to be "successful" - all with many millions more of public funds...and Las Vegas is the FASTEST GROWING CITY in the country!!!
Denver and Minneapolis also "grows" because it is part of the STATE CAPITOL region and doesn't have many competing citys in the SAME state, like NYC which sucks the life blood from everywhere else and Rochester and Syracuse and Albany, all divying-up the pieces of the pie - Minneapolis and Denver are the "only game in town" in their respective states - same with Honolulu...Buffalo is a "step child" at best and has alwayls been treated a such. I don't know why the region's citizens haven't decended on Albany and DEMANDED local autonomy for LOCAL decisions, such as metro government, etc...
I'm sure there was more I wanted to say - but this will have to do for now...
Report this
tjhorner1
Thank You!!! I have been discouraged for years, thinking that I was the only one out there that thought it was crazy to think that Main St. being a pedestrian mall was the death of downtown Buffalo. Train, or no train on Main St., downtown would be at the same place it is today...either way. Why invest millions to return cars to Main St? Why not invest those millions on cleaning up the architectural gems along Main St., and providing grants to developers to allow commercial and residential uses for all of the empty buildings that line Main St. Success breeds success, and this would surely lead to spin off development in the surrounding blocks! Build the momentum by using the money wisely!
I've been to Nicolet Pedestrian Mall in Minneapolis, and it is a huge success. Probably not because of the pedestrian mall, but certainly not in spite of it!
Report this
GDC
Main Street NEEDS some sort of activity on a daily bases to attract people there. Promote to Street venders (selling other things besides hot dogs like Pretzels, t-shirts, etc.), street performers (daily- playing instruments, doing tricks, etc.) Invest and give deals for RETAIL Business in some of the empty store fronts and create a "destination" somewhere along Main Street to spur an interest for MORE retail. I see we already have a few new retail stores popping up (GREAT!), but more is needed and especially in one area with an Anchor Store (Borders, Gap, Macy's, H&M, or something) and then watch it spread.
Report this
gaustad
there is still no "critical mass" downtown to promote main st.
Rocco's Main st. Loft project would had been a huge catalyst for the city, but I believe the city drove him away.
Very simple, bring more people to the core of the city and you will have shopping on Main regardless of traffic.
Report this
sbrof
gausted, you should listen to the WBFO this week, Rocco talks about his Main street project. It isn't dead (yet) but a major institution that used to provide the Gap financing needed because of Buffalo Rent prices is pulling its funding from such projects because of the Subprime problems.
50 million dollars could go a LONG WAY in filling in the gap needed for his and many other projects around downtown to create that density of people and money that would eventually lead to more retail. spending money to make one of the already best maintained roads in the area slightly more accessible is a waste or money.
Report this
MJWorthington
1) The casino will not become the 24hour district. Maybe within the compound itself, but do not expect any new builds going up around it filling with bars etc. Chippawa happened because of th ethe cheap old buildings already here. These do not exist around the casino site. only surface lots do.
2) How does the new coart house moving across Niagara Sq affect Chippawa negatively? It does not. If anything maybe being a block closer gives more lunch time crowd hope.
3) The economy right now and State budget are the worse they have been in a long time. There was no hope for a new convention center in the better times. It sure as hell will not be happnening any time soon.
Why lay $50mil into infrastrucutre that has has proven to not help at all north of here where cars are still allowed, or two didn't help stop the death in the first place when it could be used instead to 1) connect Metro Rail directly to a population of 40,000 on the North Campus and/or 2) provide incentives to directly create the development we are hoping for indirectly by bringing the cars back?
Report this
Wit
I'm not so keen on seeing traffic on Main, either. Personally, I suspect it would cause an unholy mess, but mostly, it costs a lot and I haven't really seen any proof that it was closing that portion of Main Street to traffic that caused the decline and/or that re-opening it would change things for the better.
What I would like to see is the city or the business district (which is already doing a good job), to somehow encourage owners of vacant properties to keep up the facades put something in the windows and make the whole place look more approachable (then, say, a boarded up district after a riot). I also wonder why some sort of area-specific advertising isn't offered. Advertising is one of the high costs of doing business, right? What if businesses went in together on it?
Report this
DeliaO2
Interesting discussion. Don't forget that Main Street was done 25 years ago and needs expensive repair anyway, due to wear and tear. Does it make sense to rebuild a design which clearly doesn't work anymore?
Even new and renovated Main Street buildings have vacant storefronts. Tenants can't take a chance on space that is hard for customers to find. Customers want to drive by, identify the location, and then find and pay for parking. The 600 block of the Theatre District used to have 10 first floor restaurants, now there are 4. Some storefronts became nightclubs that open only three nights a week. Compare to Pearl and Franklin, which were small business service streets. They now have more restaurants than Main.
The downtown economy starts with dense office space- government, banking, and business services. Next is education, then entertainment - theatre, sports, bars, restaurants and special events. Residential is growing tremendously but is still small. Retail is the sad thing that people talk about when they say downtown isn't doing well. Retail happens in storefronts and storefronts are on what street? Oh, that's right, Main Street. Let's get it open for all types of transportation.
Report this
urbanboarder
The whole EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) that was done for the LRRT in the late 1970s completely neglected the impact that the construction of this project would have on downtown. People have to realize at the time construction started on this, wholesale retailers, such as the Nemmer Building which was the Ramour & Flanigan of the day had a showroom and storefront on the ground level, and warehouse and storage of everything above it. No access for people to pull up and get their goods really killed the establishment, not to mention the changing economic climate and the effects of suburbanization that the city was enduring. Businesses will ultimately close if there are no customers, and frankly during the time of that massive project, was there anyone really wanting to deal with the mess going on? We have to look at ways to recover, and i completely agree with Delia, you need all modes of transit available, not just a single one. Elmwood thrive because there is room for pedestrians, cars, bikes, etc.. Main Street does not thrive because of access, and the way streets were reconfigured into one ways, certainly did not help. I think what the Main Place Mall is currently doing, in regards to blatantly turning everything into shit office space is atrocious. There is too much hard pavement and not enough streetscape amenities - lack of green, signage, palces for people to sit and stay awhile. Someone mentioned Fremont in Vegas, and its correct, the undesirables are everywhere, and for the most part make an attempt at getting your attention and then move on - get over them. Returning cars back to Main Street is not a waste of money at all, while they're at it, take those awful white arcs that are every thousand feet down as well, they are very unappealing. Turning things around on Main is not that hard of an obstacle, we need better collaboration and dialog with people who really give a damn, and they are out there, but simply cant make the meetings at 10am on a work day!
Report this
BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME
take the 50mil and give it to 25 different companies to entice them to move here full time. Our leaders are fucking morons
Report this
BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME
get rid of the thugs gangbangers and homeless and people will return... But no way will anyone with a Coach bag step foot on Main... More like mainline heroin avenue
Report this