Beautifying Brutalism

Beautifying Brutalism

Story Options

I still find it uncanny that there are people out there who like this brutalist building. It's the Frank A. Sedita City Court building, and to me it looks like something out of the movie Tron. At this point I have conceded that it's not going anywhere, but is there anything that could be done to make it look 'less brutal'? Past commentors have offered up suggestions like climbing walls or a giant neon sculpture - those are interesting ideas, though I'm not sure that they would go far in Buffalo.

Steel recalls that the building once had ivy growing on the side of it. Now that is an idea that should be re-examined. Many people believe that ivy is bad for buildings... in this case I don't think that the plant would have any ill-effect since there is not much along the lines of masonry. With the building of the new Federal Courthouse across the way, and the work being done on City Hall, maybe it is time to see what can be done to beautify another nearby building located on Niagara Square.

Rock Harbor

What Others Have To Say

  1. PaulBuffalo

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 12:50

    The nicest thing about the building is the Kenneth Snelson steel sculpture in the building's courtyard on Niagara Square.

  2. Activist

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 12:53

    The only two strategies that would work here are greening (Ivy would work) and large, creative, professional-grade art murals featuring some local muralists (there are several) with distinctive color patterns. To do nothing would be bleak and kafkaesque. I don't think we need any more depression in this town.

  3. sally

    8 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 12:58

    It should obviously be left as is - an example of a particular style of architecture. If Buffalo want's to be thought of as a living arcitectural museum it is omportant to have many styles represented.

  4. sbrof

    7 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:00

    I thought there still is Ivy on the Delaware side of the building? I also fall into the category of those that actually like this building. It say what happens inside these walls are not concerned about the politics and whims of the rest of the world. Justice, should be divorced from influence, the law is the law.

    The ivy looks very nice as the structure almost resembles from Mayan temple when its creeping over the stonelike facade. Bring back the Ivy (if is really is gone) and let the building appear to rise from the green earth itself.

    Also there are forms of Ivy that will not damage the facade of buildings. There are species that use suction cups instead of roots that attach to the facade. Such Ivy is used on the facade of E&E in Lancaster as an environmental way to shade and cool their building. Take a couple clipping and cultivate it here. It would be fun to see how high it will grow.

  5. STEEL

    4 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:01

    Ok,

    I admit I have always had a soft spot for this building.

    For some reason the city has always cut the ivy down. I would suggest installing a 6 story LED dispay system. It can be done fairly easily with todays technology. It can be done with simple cable mounted light sources so you don't even need a heavy new structure to support it. check this out

    http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/greenpix_led_wall.jpg

    And see lots more including videos here http://www.colorkinetics.com/showcase/videos/

  6. PDB

    3 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:05

    It is hard to believe that in a city with such great architecture that anyone could have approved that design. Looks like a prison. I have tried interesting Donnie Esmond and others to take up the cause and do something to get rid of the eye sore. If the Dulski building can be pealed away and a new skin put on.... why not here. (forget the cost for now)

  7. ExWNYer

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:07

    Agreed , Steel. Put up a big screen. You could do something cool like they did in Chicago with Crown Fountain

  8. rydog71

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:20

    I know most will disagree but this is a great surface for a billboard location. Whether it be print or a more aggressive use of video the city could generate a lot of money selling the space.

  9. paragon

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:21

    Outline this building in white neon. While this would do nothing during the day, at night would be quite impressive.

  10. Matthewjohnp

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:39

    Paint it to look like a shocking pink penis. Can we say penis on this blog?

  11. NorPark

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:39

    I like the billboard idea, i'm sure the 'gentlemens clubs' across the border would be interested in this fine space.

  12. Matthewjohnp

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:40

    Paint it to look like a shocking pink penis. Can we say penis on this blog?

  13. flyguy

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:50

    For one i'm glad society and the architectural community got out of this architectural phase in exchange for something better however I do appreciate a building like this because it does represent an era of human history and that "phase" of Buffalo. I think its good for a city to have examples of a number of eras of architecture, it makes things more diverse and interesting. By no means does this mean I support all the 60's and 70's monstrosities out there like the convention center that had a much larger negative impact due to its horizontal scale and lengthy wall effect.

  14. BuffaloBloviator

    5 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:52

    I like Steel's idea of using a giant LED screen. Then they could display a giant picture of a real building.

    This building should be in text books as an example of the utter failure, fallacy, and fraud of the "modern architecture" movement.

    How in the world did architecture schools succomb to the audacity that their whims warrent the wholesale abandonment of the accumulated knowledge of the centuries' masters?

    If someone wants to peform architectural fashion experiments or political statements on their own dime thats fine with me, but public buildings should be held to a standard of established architectural decorum.

    Tear down this wall!

  15. oldimpala

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 13:58

    Well....

    Actually; I dislike Brutalism, on the whole, but love this building. This is a fantastic example; well scaled, the type of building that CAN be this type of arcitecture (Unlike, say, Apartments), and fit in the mix of styles presently in Niagara Square.

    Plus, Phohl, Roberts and Biggie (Not Smalls) are actually a well noted group of designers; it's a nice piece to have in the portfolio.

    I prefer City Hall, prefer the BAC Building, even prefer the new glass/steel ellipse which will be the new Federal Court building, but c'mon guys, give it a rest, this is actually a well-done, well scaled, well placed piece of brutalism. And we will be thankful to have it in a few years, next to the at-one-time eyesores that everyone raves about today.

    So, yeah, I enjoy it.. To each his own, guys..... And to compare this to the Donovan Building? A cookie cutter piece of stamped 50's trash shows just how little Brutalism is understood on this website.

    So, Sally and Sbrof, it looks like the three of us.. :)

  16. Quinn

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 14:03

    How 'bout large panels of glass. That sure would make happy the people who complain that Buffalo does not look like a "modern" city. Or does that create reflection hazards, like frying birds mid-air in the hot Buffalo summer sun?

    BTW - the basement/ground floor parking area is just a lovely as the rest of the building but at least we can accept and understand that 'decor' from a basement...

  17. katsura

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 14:04

    I like it too. Green it with a cable trellis system such as found: http://www.jakob-usa.com/

  18. oldimpala

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 14:05

    Oh...

    And Brutalism wasn't meant to be beautified...

    I can hear Le Corbusier quietly moaning in his grave over the title alone.

  19. Wit

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 14:24

    Add me to the list of the people who unapologetically like the building (I never knew there were so many of us). It grew on me while I worked there. I like its starkness - though I was also a fan of the half-overgrown with ivy look that it had going for a while. About the only thing I'm not a fan of is the little white projections on the very top - they seem to ruin the lines for me.

    To improve its looks? Give it a good scrubbing and work on sprucing up the inside!

  20. davvid

    4 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 14:45

    Seems childish and disrespectful to start proposing ornaments for a building that is intentionally unornamented . The building might seem strange (especially if you relate to the real world through movies that you've seen) but it is good and has a very strong identity that should not be ruined by half-assed efforts(like the pink pavement). This reminds me of a child trying a strange new food for the first time -- tempted to cover it with ketchup. Lets grow up.

  21. LivingForge

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 14:59

    I rather like this building just the way it is.

  22. Aloha

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 15:00

    I like this building too. I wouldn't want a city skyline full of them, but this is one building that stands apart from the rest. Wit, I can't imagine what it must be like to work inside that building though. Doesn't the lack of windows bother you when you're inside all day?

  23. Wit

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 15:14

    Aloha - It didn't really bother me, to be honest. You don't need windows in the courtroom and the secretary's area actually had an enormous window along one wall.

  24. doc

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 15:27

    This building and others in the city (e.g., the "Miami Style" apartment towers on Delaware Ave.) represent viable forms of architecture that should be represented in a city of Buffalo's Architectural caliber. People were aghast when the French Impressionists presented their art forms now they're worth millions. Frank L Wright's designs have frequently been called into question and he is considered to be the father of American Architecture (Guggenheim). This "Brutalist" architectural form in our Court Building should be celebrated. I propose lighting the structure and enhancing the surrounding area with lighting and complementing works of art as well. Please see the movie "The Fountainhead" or read Ann Rand's novel and many of the naysayers who have posted on this site will see themselves portrayed in the role of the protagonist. This building will be around a lot longer than we will.

  25. bison716

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 15:33

    Power hose it down, till its a sparkling off-white, and light it up with huge white spot-lights from the floor at night big-time! Think of the contrast using the lights and cool shadows it would make. That would be the immediate fix, long term would definitely be a huge screen of some sort.

  26. PaulBuffalo

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 15:50

    Do no harm. Leave the building alone. Let future generations determine whether the building is worth saving.

  27. marcusbooster

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 15:53

    Oh leave it be please. Reading some of these ideas like "painting a mural" on top of it make me want to vomit a little. It's a style or architecture. Buffalo can move on with the rest of the world from Art Deco you know.

  28. InformedOne

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 16:06

    Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Boston Creeper) would be more aggressive growing vine and more aesthetically engaging 9as it turns red in the fall with dark berries) than straight ivy. If one was concerned about the climbing vine removing moisture from the concrete facade, the climbing vine could be trained to climb on stainless steel strands affixed to the building a few inches off the facade. It could look really cool, especially if the vine was trained around a certain design.

  29. InformedOne

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 16:08

    Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Boston Creeper) would be more aggressive growing vine and more aesthetically engaging 9as it turns red in the fall with dark berries) than straight ivy. If one was concerned about the climbing vine removing moisture from the concrete facade, the climbing vine could be trained to climb on stainless steel strands affixed to the building a few inches off the facade. It could look really cool, especially if the vine was trained around a certain design.

  30. bfloghost

    4 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 16:28

    I would love to see gigantic Cellino & Barnes heads covering all four sides, I just can't seem to get enough of those two.

  31. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 17:38

    Ha!

    I always thought it was a holding center. Thank God I have never had to be inside either. I understand those who say keep it as is. It is a style and just accept it.

    Now, taking that off the table and IF something were to be done, here is my suggestion:

    It looks as if there are ten rows of panels made of stone per side. Only 3 sides are facing the street, for a total of 30 rows visible.

    Maybe take each row and dedicate it to a decade in the history of Buffalo starting in 1790. You could sand blast a mural of sorts into each row. Going an inch or two deep.

    This way, from a distance, you would get one perspective. The original intent of the building. To some cold and uninviting to other magnificent. But when you take a closer look and pause for examination, you would see a beautiful history laid out like no place else on Earth. Kinda like Buffalo itself if you think about it.

  32. gaustad

    4 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 17:44

    Put a huge Buffalo Sabres logo on all sides that light up at night, that will satisfy most people in town....Go Sabres!

  33. carl

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 18:34

    we should get the cfgb folks to draw some home depot windows on the side with photo shop.

    that should work.

  34. buffaloweiner

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 18:43

    Im no fan of modern architecture or contemporary architecture though if done well, I can certainly appreciate the asthetics

    Frankly, I thought the Dulski was a nice looking building and didnt need a new facade though I would have extended the first few floors to the sidewalk.

    Frankly, the city court building isnt that bad a building either. The biggest problem with the city court building is that its in the wrong location. Its built right on top of the street grid...which I think is Genesse Street;s connection to the waterfront. If the city court building were built in any other location, then it would not be such a thorn in the sides of Buffalonians.

    As an example...look at the parking lots nearby the city court building and the parking garages...any one of which could have been the site of the city court and kept the grid open...and the parking garages could have gone another block or two away.

    Yes, Ivy would do alot to humanize it.

  35. ExWNYer

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 19:21

    Or make it into a large urban rock climbing wall. I guess someone would end up getting hurt and then they would be inside the building with their lawsuit.

  36. MJWorthington

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 19:22

    The portion I dislike the most is the parking garage encroaching on W. Genesee cutting it off from Niagara Square and its path towards the lake (which is then blocked by the 190.)

  37. urbanbflolover

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 19:26

    I use this as an example in class when I talk about how the Communists built buildings in Eastern Europe after WWII. Warsaw is full of buildings like this....

  38. MJWorthington

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 19:29

    some nice clean unfaded windows would do a lot too....

  39. sbrof

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 20:35

    I agree with MJ,,, the parking garage next door has a much larger detriment to our city and its integrity than this building.

  40. stewie

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 20:46

    The views from the interior are astounding.

  41. PDB

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 20:49

    I definitly need another large vodka on the rocks. I can't imagine how so may posters like the building; they must all be under 35.

  42. Bufago

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 21:03

    Rubble, a great big pile of rubble, and get those cheap ass judges to pay to put their names on public buildings, they are the ultimate welfare dads...parasites!

  43. B-LoLawStu

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 21:41

    I was actually at this building today to sit in on some proceedings with an attorney from my work. The one good thing I can say about it is that when the attorney told me to meet him at the "big windowless building" downtown I knew exactly where to go...

  44. 300miles

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 22:54

    buffaloweiner - the court building isn't blocking the street grid. The parking garage next door to it is what's blocking the continuation of Genessee... but only slightly. It's really not an issue with the the convention center and mall already completely chopping up that street.

  45. 300miles

    4 ratings12345
    Aug 19th 2008, 23:01

    The whole concept of "covering" over this building to make it prettier is somewhat misguided. It's designed to look that way purposely... (hence the "brutalist" description...) This building shouldn't be covered any more than a victorian house shouldn't be covered in z-brick.

    What matters most is the human scaled view on the ground. It just needs landscaping. Mature trees around the base would drastically improve the feel of people walking around the city. The building itself is all concrete.. we don't need to pave every inch of ground around it as well.

    Please no murals though. Niagara Square would be ruined with cheesy murals...

  46. NewBuffalo

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 20th 2008, 07:51

    Great building to hang a portrait of JIMMY GRIFFIN!

    And JIM KELLY

  47. Activist

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 20th 2008, 09:58

    Okay! I take back the mural idea, but I'm sticking with the ivy. While the building's architectural style MAY have some significance, it's bleak and needs to be visually softened.

  48. oldimpala

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 20th 2008, 10:31

    Seriously we need to just leave it alone...

    I'd say Ivy and some trees don't violate the ideals of Brutalism; but the whole concept of the bleak, massive, imposing concrete wall IS the concept. Softening it is kida contrary.

    And, PDB, yeah. I'm 32. It's a shame people older than that can't respect it for what it was/is. Not my favorite phase of design, but an important piece of mid-late 20th century design. Just as important, and just as enduring than the Victorian era, Art Deco/Moderne era, etc.. They all have their moments.

    Some people probably hate City Hall, Shea's, Central Terminal, and the Guaranty Building. Enough people obviuosly disliked the Larkin Building enough to knock it down...

    Put it in perspective folks; good design is supposed to evoke a reaction. It did.

  49. oldimpala

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 20th 2008, 10:41

    Seriously we need to just leave it alone...

    I'd say Ivy and some trees don't violate the ideals of Brutalism; but the whole concept of the bleak, massive, imposing concrete wall IS the concept. Softening it is kida contrary.

    And, PDB, yeah. I'm 32. It's a shame people older than that can't respect it for what it was/is. Not my favorite phase of design, but an important piece of mid-late 20th century design. Just as important, and just as enduring than the Victorian era, Art Deco/Moderne era, etc.. They all have their moments.

    Some people probably hate City Hall, Shea's, Central Terminal, and the Guaranty Building. Enough people obviuosly disliked the Larkin Building enough to knock it down...

    Put it in perspective folks; good design is supposed to evoke a reaction. It did.

  50. edoubz

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 20th 2008, 18:13

    i think that if all the other great ideas mentioned are shot down, then they should just throw up some tinted glass curtain walls around the building.

    p.s. love the LED/billboard wall idea!!

  51. sb16

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 20th 2008, 19:32

    bring back Green Lightning!!!!!

  52. georgethomasapfel

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 20th 2008, 20:30

    Architecture is like art--subjective and it's beauty or beastliness is in the eye of the beholder. I'm not a fan of Brutalism, I prefer Richardson Romanesque or E.B. Green over what could be called "Tower of Tron."

    That being said, in its context, I like it. A stark contrast to the classic forms which surround it--its purely functional minimalist design offers variety to the great examples of the of the 19th and early 20th century craftsmanship which surround it. So in the big picture, I think it works...no neon needed here.

  53. buffaloweiner

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 20th 2008, 20:53

    Frankly, state, city, surrogates, family, county courts...are pretty much all old and outdated...

    It really wouldnt hurt with the new Federal Court House to consider one new large tower to replace all the other out dated ones.

    Though...its the parking garage for city court that is the biggest problem. It really needs to go along with the Hyatt atrium and reopen genesee street.

  54. sonyactivision

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 20th 2008, 23:35

    It's an example of late-modern Brutalist architecture, but it's not a particularly good one. As a municipal courthouse, it's just obsolete and needs a thorough remodel or outright replacement. In the meantime, ivy, LED displays, etc. all sound good but in the context of its neighbors, some of which are significant, it really needs a big overhaul, just like the Dulski. I would replace those blank walls with vertcal brick bands and open up much more of its surface with very lightly tinted glass. At the plaza level, in contrast to the tower's shaft, I would actually amp up some brutalist elements such as travertine marble and roughly poured concrete to narrate the building's aesthetic origins. Add to that, a glassy new entry pavillion and I think this leaden ship could finally sail.

  55. JohnMarko

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 21st 2008, 23:28

    OK guys - I guess nobody from PRB is looking at this site, so I guess I'll have to do.

    I was a young Architect at PRB - one of my first jobs after school - and was there when they were doing that thing and the convention center as well. I'll leave the mistake of the convention center to another discussion (that too was first and foremost a budgetary consideration - if I'm not mistaken, there was a sort of "competition" and that thing won.

    First and foremost, it the design was initiated right after the death of Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas. So the powers that be, along with the architect, decided that it would be a good thing to have a completely secure building without any chance of anything like that ever happening again here.

    There are windows only on the ends - in the corridors. The courtrooms are intentionally left without windows to avoid any distractions from the proceedings.

    Prisoners arrrive undergrouind and in a secure holding center, and are delivered in separate elevators to hallways to the courtrooms to prevent any Jack Ruby type slayings.

    Say what you want, but the building is a product of it's time in history, and as such functions perfectly.

    It was designed with a large scupture adorning each blank facade - but that budget was cut almost immediatelyl. The sculpture can still be done.

    THe original scheme for the "yard" fronting the building was to have been heavily landscaped, with large trees, etc. That would have softened the "brutal" effect, too.

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I am one of those that acutally likes the building. Having it close to the street is a GOOD thing, as the real "front yard" is Niagara Square itself.

  56. JohnMarko

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 21st 2008, 23:31

    Oh, and one more thing:

    Too many of you just drool over the ugly as shit derelict grain elevators, but don't like the look of this building?

    Yes, I know the historical significance of the grain elevators on the WORLD's "'modern" architecture...

    Go figure...

  57. sonyactivision

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 22nd 2008, 19:57

    If one of those "ugly as shit derelict grain elevators" was fronting Niagara square, facing City Hall, I would be drooling alright, drooling for a controlled demolition.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Members Who Bookmarked

Text Links