Amur Tigers are Buffalonians Too

Amur Tigers are Buffalonians Too

Story Options

Ok, so I'm a sucker for animals. How could you not be when you see a photo like this? Featured is an endangered Amur tiger by the name of Sungari, who is the proud mother of two cubs (male and female), born on the 7th of October at the Buffalo Zoo. This may not seem like breaking news to some, but when you think about the state of the Amur tiger, then this IS big news. The tigers, formerly known as Siberian tigers, are no longer even found in Siberia (news to me). The animals can now only be found, living in the wild, along the Amur River in Russia. When I first read that the tigers were on the endangered list, it did not register just how endangered they actually were. Then I read that there are an estimated 350 to 450 of them living in the wild. And zero to be found in Siberia?

It's times like these that I'm glad to have the Buffalo Zoo. I can honestly say that I was saddened to hear that the zoo was not moving to a bigger home on the waterfront a few years ago. I felt (and still feel) that the animals need more space to roam. I also think that the current zoo would have made an incredible people park... like Artpark. But that didn't happen and The Zoo really has no place to spread its wings in its current location. When I hear that Buffalo is the proud new parent of such magnificent creatures, it make me proud to know that we are doing our part to raise awareness for endangered animals such as the Amur Tiger. I just hope that as our city begins to prosper we share that good fortune with our friends at The Zoo.

Side note: The mother and the cubs will not be on display (that sounds so gallery-ish) for the next three months. Please support The Zoo by making a donation today.

Check out the animal's wishlist:

Large KONG dog toys | Soft/moist dog treats | Small, medium and large rawhides (all flavors) | Plastic five-gallon buckets with lids | Peanut butter | Cereal (Cheerios, Fruit Loops, Apple Jacks, Raisin Bran) | Sugar free Kool-Aid | Honey | Gatorade | Marshmallow fluff | Animal crackers | Unsalted peanuts | Trail mix (without chocolate).

Or consider adopting an animal.

Or just volunteer your time.

prometheus233.com half banner

What Others Have To Say

  1. Matthewjohnp

    7 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 19:10

    Hey queenseyes, how about I put you in a cage in my basement and tell me how happy you will be? Close this ^%$#^&* zoo! Supporting this zoo is a kin to supporting concentration camps for animals. Unless you are into those sort of things...

  2. queenseyes

    2 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 19:25

    Matthewjohnp, like I said, I was for The Zoo moving downtown. That didn't happen. I haven't heard anything about The Zoo closing, so I'll support the animals that are there. Are you saying not to support the animals in hopes that they just fade away? Honestly, what would you do other than throw me in your basement and tell me how happy I am?

  3. benfranklin

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 19:47

    It seems a bit odd if this is a publicity photo, that the zoo would release something with those tiles so predominantly displayed. I've never been against the zoo, but this picture looks a bit 'mugshot' like.

    Well...one more thing to add to the 'hopefully-in-Buffalo-before-I-die" list. 1.) Superbowl 2.) Stanley Cup 3.) Skyway down 4.) Bridge up 5.) More room for the animals in a better setting.

  4. al-alo

    3 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 19:59

    concentration camps for animals?

    wow. that is a touch hyperbolic, no? youre right, its a lot hyperbolic. maybe we should set all pets free too?

    so close all the zoos, let the endangered animal dies out. maybe you should be focus on perserving the evironment, instead of attacking what might be these animals last hope before extinction. methinks, you are missing the forest for the trees (no "green" pun intended).

    and not that i know this, but let me guess at it anyway, that this room might have more to do with the newborn cubs, and is not the usual habitat.

  5. Matthewjohnp

    9 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 20:29

    Zoos are 19th century relics of a spoiled upper middle class now relegated to the working class and their pudgey little kids eating animal crackers and fries. I would rather the animals die a natural death then be locked up in cages where they do not belong. But when we lose the Bills where else can we piss away our tax payer dollars?

  6. Crazed_da_Loon

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 20:30

    A bigger zoo on the waterfront was a great idea. I never understood the "save our zoo" signs. I wish we would have built that.

  7. Ike

    4 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 20:34

    Matthewjohnp, Are you a member of PETA? because you sound like a fucking MANIAC

  8. Crazed_da_Loon

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 20:50

    Hey al-alo,

    Care to go check out the Treblinca Community Zoo with me someday soon? I hear it's the Cadillac of animal concentration camps.

  9. egyarnetsky

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 21:21

    My wife and I visited the zoo a couple weeks ago on a visit to Buffalo (I'm an expat) and were struck by both the good and the bad. The newer exhibits seemed progressive, but the caged mini-exhibits were indeed awful. I'd think depopulating and becoming a specialty zoo is a good option-- much as the botanical gardens are working on the Buffalo Meridian concept.

    And boy are those Amurian-Buffalonians darn cute...

  10. egyarnetsky

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 21:23

    P.S.-- I like the new(er) zoo logo, but does anyone know why there's not a bison on it?

  11. icecreamsub

    2 ratings12345
    Oct 23rd 2007, 22:15

    whether Matthewjohnp is a member of PETA or not, he makes more sense than any of the other comments here. Zoos are a dated concept for conservation....they claim to inform but are really intended to entertain.....not quite to the dispicable level of the circus but still pretty awful never the less. The Flaming Lips hit right on with Christmas at the Zoo

  12. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 00:33

    You're right, icecreamsub, zoos are about entertainment so think of the level of entertainment you get for your zoo dollar: bored creatures in cages and little "habitats" that only perk up around feeding time of when the smell of distant rut wafts in the air above the smog fumes. Probably the most entertaining zoo animal was a chimpanzee that picked up a nasty smoking habit at a zoo in Northern China after zoo-goers kept tossing lit cigarettes into its cage. That poor creature had to enter the hard-nosed chinese version of a twelve step program to kick the habit. On the bright side, it probably gained some weight, on the bad side, whole generations of schoolkids are now deprived of the opportunity to witness first hand, the effects of indolence. For its part, The Buffalo Zoo could light up the tigers like Niagara Falls at night or install slot machines that feed a critter with every pair of cherries. Zoos still have an important place in our society. They are truly an underutilized asset.

  13. georgethomasapfel

    3 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 01:44

    Where else can a lot of kids witness first hand creatures who's natural habitats are growing smaller and smaller through encroaching civilization, the raping of the rainforests, etc. I lived close enough to the Buffalo Zoo where I could hear the big cats roaring and learned volumes from seeing these fantastic animals up close. So yes, it's entertainment but also education. Concentration camps for animals? Dunno, I think it's more cruel to have them fending in the wild for an ever-shrinking food supply (and in the west an ever-shrinking water supply.)

    Nature's way of handling such shortcomings is called extinction.

  14. Fudgeworth

    5 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 04:45

    Mathhewjohnp,

    I have noticed that around 40% of the commenters of this website make their comments based on incorrect beliefs. They have not read anything on the subjects that they comment on, but act like experts. IKE showed his ignorance by assuming that you were a member of PETA, and calling you a name (the same tactic used by 3rd graders). 2 other people agreed with this analysis and gave him a 5 star rating.

    The zoos as conservation logic is silly. You should want to conserve animals in their true natural state. Wildlife preserves with skilled specialists is the way to go:

    http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2005/2005-07-26-02.asp

    Waiting for the one star rating.

  15. Matthewjohnp

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 07:09

    Fudgeworth you are a reasoned person and if we have to maintain animal lines to avoid extintion, a wildlife preserve is the best way to go. I give you 6 stars baby!

  16. halljd39

    4 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 08:26

    In my opinion, the Buffalo Zoo should take over the Delaware Golf Course to expand. Having The Zoo in Parkside is a great asset to the neighborhood.

    The fact of the matter is that The Buffalo Zoo was one of the only city instutions that actually made money. I'm sure that if The Zoo did not turn a profit, the precious animals would probably be sent to another zoo. And if my memory serves me correctly, Buffalo also has one of the oldest zoo's in the nation.

    I think a lot of the negative comments, non-sequiturs, and bashing is terrible. These animals are part of the culture of Buffalo and it would be a shame if we lost this treasure cove.

  17. bflorox

    2 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 09:14

    OK, here I go...Most zoos have breeding programs for endangered species with a concerted effort among them to avoid too much duplicated effort. Nationwide this results a large number of endangered species being saved. This is good. Yes, standards for zoos have changed. That is why the zoo has embarked upon a 10 year renovation of the ENTIRE facility. In eight years, practically every square inch of the property will have been modernized and upgraded to provide an even more comfortable habitat for the animals and a more enjoyable experience for the patrons. Why do the haters always assume that when they see an animal asleep or lying down that they must be bored. Animals in nature roam because they are constantly in search of food or water, not for entertainment. When excellent nutrition is brought right to you, there is no need to constantly be on the move in search of your next meal while, in some cases, hoping not to become one. Animals lie around a lot to conserve energy, especially the larger ones, so please do not confuse inactivity with boredom. The zoo keepers daily interactions with the animals provides all sorts of stimulation. That combined with games and challenges provided to get to their food and excellent medical care, zoo animals lead a lifestyle that rivals anything they would have in nature. In a perfect world there would be no human predator encroaching on their territory and contributing to their demise. This is not a perfect world so it will also take human intervention and zoos to preserve what is left and educate others to support their cause.

  18. Balth

    2 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 09:39

    How about we expand the zoo into that DISGUSTING parking lot to the south? I consider that parking lot one of the worst in the city. There are NO trees or greenery anywhere in this sea of blacktop. Also, you people who are bashing the zoo need to get over it. Obviously the zoo wouldnt be in existance if they abused the animals. People need to stop acting like the zoo is "getting away with something" by tricking all of us into thinking that they treat the animals well, but really behind closed doors they are abusing them. I know people who have volunteered at the zoo, and they couldnt have more pride for taking care of the animals.

  19. fredrico

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 10:31

    It's not only what we do but how we do it - look at the space the giraffes and elephants have to walk or run in and tell me the OUR zoo is a good idea for these animals? They need more room. Yes, it is wonderful to protect endangered species but can't we provide them a better quality of life than that?

  20. buffalocat

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 11:05

    I have never liked zoos, and always felt depressed when I went to visit them. But I knew the head vet at the Audubon Zoo in New Orleans, and he somewhat changed my persepctive by pointing out that most reputable zoos in North America provide relatively safe homes for animals that have been born in captivity - especially when they are removed from traveling circuses or people's homes, which is a lot more common than I'd ever realized.

    I didn't live in Buffalo when this waterfront expansion was proposed, so I know nothing about it. But my suggestion would be to explore moving the animals to a rural location, and creating a "destination zoo", much like North Carolina's zoo. I don't know if anyone else has ever been there, but it's the only zoo I've ever visited that didn't make me completely cringe. It is located in a rural area about an hour from Charlotte, and it has extremely limited hours, to give the animals resting time. The "exhibits" are laid out in very naturalistic settings along long, windy trails, with different species of animals sharing gigantic plots of land, much as they would in the wild. These huge plots are only visible from a couple angles, so the animals have large swaths of land that cannot be viewed by park visitors. When we visited, there were numerous species that we couldn't see at all, but large signs explain the mentality behind providing all this space for the animals. Perhaps most importantly, the animals at the NC Zoo come from small regional zoos that close or from abusive or dangerous situations (all of their polar beers were rescued from a southern side-show circus, where the conditions left them near death). The zoo has done a great job curating the zoo to explain the dangers of these practices, and the need for people to think about habitat preservation and ending animal poaching and capturing. Really, it's pretty impressive. Anyone else been?

  21. fredrico

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 11:21

    To Buffalocat- Thank you for doing a beauitful job describing what we should/could be doing for our zoo animals here. The arrangements at the North Carolina zoo reflect a larger focus on quality of life in their planning/arrangements for the animals. Anyone who isn't ashamed of our zoo is in denial - in my opinion.

  22. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 24th 2007, 23:33

    Is there an assisted living zoo for those animals that have aged and want to spend their last days of captivity with dignity?

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links